P-638. Impact of Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) Nasal Screening on Antimicrobial De-escalation in Patients Admitted with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important yet uncommon cause of inpatient community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). While the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/IDSA) guidelines recommend rapid MRSA nasal screening to guide anti-MRSA antibiotic (abx) therapy when MRSA CAP is suspected, guideline adherence and its impact on abx use is unclear. We aimed to assess the prevalence of MRSA screening and its effect on abx de-escalation in inpatients with CAP. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed adult admissions for CAP across 12 U.S. hospitals from November 2022 - January 2024. Anti-MRSA abx utilization and MRSA screening was assessed in both ICU and non-ICU patients. De-escalation was defined as stopping all anti-MRSA agents within 48 hours of the first dose. We compared abx de-escalation rates of patients started on empiric anti-MRSA between those screened vs those not screened. Propensity score adjustment methods were employed to assess the association between MRSA screening and anti-MRSA antibiotic de-escalation, calculating the odds ratio (OR) for de-escalation. Positive and negative predictive values of MRSA screening were also calculated. Results Of 12,232 CAP hospitalizations, 1886 were admitted to ICU and the rest to medical wards. Thirty percent of non-ICU and 68% of ICU patients were started on anti-MRSA antibiotics within 48 hours of admission. CAP patients started on empiric anti-MRSA antibiotics were significantly more likely than those not started on them to be screened (95% vs. 74% in ICU and 76% vs. 19% outside ICU, p&amp;lt; 0.001 for both). Patients with a negative MRSA screen were more often de-escalated within 48 hours than those with no screening outside the ICU (84% vs. 71%, p&amp;lt; 0.001) and in the ICU (82% vs. 55%, p&amp;lt; 0.001). In propensity-adjusted analysis, screened patients had significantly greater odds of de-escalation compared to those not screened (non-ICU OR: 2.10 95% CI 1.85-2.38; ICU OR: 3.65 95% CI 3.00-4.45). The positive and negative predictive values of MRSA screening were 3.33% and 99.86% in non-ICU, and 6.83% and 99.78% in ICU, respectively. Conclusion MRSA screening was strongly associated with abx de-escalation, especially in the ICU. A negative screen had a very high negative predictive value. Disclosures Abhishek Deshpande, MD, PhD, AHRQ: Grant/Research Support|Clorox Healthcare: Grant/Research Support Andrea Pallotta, PharmD, Astra Zeneca: Advisor/Consultant|Viiv: Advisor/Consultant Michael Klompas, MD, MPH, AHRQ: Grant/Research Support|CDC: Grant/Research Support|UpToDate: Royalties Michael Rothberg, MD, MPH, Blue Cross Blue Shield: Advisor/Consultant|CRISPER: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)|Moderna: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.835
Primary Topic
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-638. Impact of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Screening on Antimicrobial De-escalation in Patients Admitted with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Michael B. Rothberg, Abhishek Deshpande, Michael Klompas, Ming Wang et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
article

P-638. Impact of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Screening on Antimicrobial De-escalation in Patients Admitted with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Michael B. Rothberg, Abhishek Deshpande, Michael Klompas, Ming Wang, Ramara E Walker, Andrea Pallotta, Sarah Haessler, Rebecca Schulte
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important yet uncommon cause of inpatient community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). While the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/IDSA) guidelines recommend rapid MRSA nasal screening to guide anti-MRSA antibiotic (abx) therapy when MRSA CAP is suspected, guideline adherence and its impact on abx use is unclear. We aimed to assess the prevalence of MRSA screening and its effect on abx de-escalation in inpatients with CAP. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed adult admissions for CAP across 12 U.S. hospitals from November 2022 - January 2024. Anti-MRSA abx utilization and MRSA screening was assessed in both ICU and non-ICU patients. De-escalation was defined as stopping all anti-MRSA agents within 48 hours of the first dose. We compared abx de-escalation rates of patients started on empiric anti-MRSA between those screened vs those not screened. Propensity score adjustment methods were employed to assess the association between MRSA screening and anti-MRSA antibiotic de-escalation, calculating the odds ratio (OR) for de-escalation. Positive and negative predictive values of MRSA screening were also calculated. Results Of 12,232 CAP hospitalizations, 1886 were admitted to ICU and the rest to medical wards. Thirty percent of non-ICU and 68% of ICU patients were started on anti-MRSA antibiotics within 48 hours of admission. CAP patients started on empiric anti-MRSA antibiotics were significantly more likely than those not started on them to be screened (95% vs. 74% in ICU and 76% vs. 19% outside ICU, p&amp;lt; 0.001 for both). Patients with a negative MRSA screen were more often de-escalated within 48 hours than those with no screening outside the ICU (84% vs. 71%, p&amp;lt; 0.001) and in the ICU (82% vs. 55%, p&amp;lt; 0.001). In propensity-adjusted analysis, screened patients had significantly greater odds of de-escalation compared to those not screened (non-ICU OR: 2.10 95% CI 1.85-2.38; ICU OR: 3.65 95% CI 3.00-4.45). The positive and negative predictive values of MRSA screening were 3.33% and 99.86% in non-ICU, and 6.83% and 99.78% in ICU, respectively. Conclusion MRSA screening was strongly associated with abx de-escalation, especially in the ICU. A negative screen had a very high negative predictive value. Disclosures Abhishek Deshpande, MD, PhD, AHRQ: Grant/Research Support|Clorox Healthcare: Grant/Research Support Andrea Pallotta, PharmD, Astra Zeneca: Advisor/Consultant|Viiv: Advisor/Consultant Michael Klompas, MD, MPH, AHRQ: Grant/Research Support|CDC: Grant/Research Support|UpToDate: Royalties Michael Rothberg, MD, MPH, Blue Cross Blue Shield: Advisor/Consultant|CRISPER: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)|Moderna: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Baystate Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.