P-1400. Feasibility, Acceptability and Impact of Self-Sample Collection for Extra-genital STI Testing: Experience from a High Complexity VA Facility

Abstract Background Routine screening of all exposed extra-genital sites for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), specifically Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), is recommended for individuals at high risk, including some men who have sex with men (MSM) and individuals receiving Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP). However, there are a number of barriers to screening including privacy and provider availability. While self-collected extra-genital STI samples have the potential to mitigate some of these barriers, this approach has not yet achieved widespread use. This study evaluates the implementation of self-collection of extra-genital STI tests at the VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System (VANEOHS), assesses acceptability and measures impact on testing rates. Methods The study included people with HIV (PWH) and patients on PrEP at the VANEOHS’s infectious diseases clinic and covered 10 Ohio counties. Patients chose between self- and provider-collection. We followed GC and CT rectal and pharyngeal testing frequency and test completion rates and characterized reasons for unsuccessful completion. We also compared extra-genital GC/CT testing rates before and after the availability of self-collection. Finally, we deployed an anonymous survey to assess acceptability of self-collection and ease of use. We used descriptive statistics to report completion rates, survey findings and changes in rates of testing over time. Results Of the 276 tests ordered for self-collection for 95 unique veterans, 82 pharyngeal and 60 rectal GC/CT rectal tests were successfully completed and interpreted in the first 8 months of the study (Table 1). The testing rate increased from 8 tests/month to 15 tests/month for pharyngeal GC/CT and from 6 tests/month to 10 tests/month for rectal GC/CT (Figure 1). Of the survey respondents who performed self-collection, 11 of 17 were satisfied or very satisfied with self-collection and most found it easy or very easy to swab their own rectum (9/12) and throat (13/14) (Table 2). Conclusion Self-sample collection for extra-genital testing is feasible in a large healthcare network. It is highly desired by patients and has the potential to improve access and improve STI screening rates. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1575
Primary Topic
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1400. Feasibility, Acceptability and Impact of Self-Sample Collection for Extra-genital STI Testing: Experience from a High Complexity VA Facility

Amy Hirsch Shumaker, Kristen Allen, Maria E. Navas, Lewis Musoke et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
article

P-1400. Feasibility, Acceptability and Impact of Self-Sample Collection for Extra-genital STI Testing: Experience from a High Complexity VA Facility

Amy Hirsch Shumaker, Kristen Allen, Maria E. Navas, Lewis Musoke, Puja Van Epps, Stephanie Walker, Kaylee Bray, Rachel Waitzman, Michelle Mercurio
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Routine screening of all exposed extra-genital sites for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), specifically Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), is recommended for individuals at high risk, including some men who have sex with men (MSM) and individuals receiving Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP). However, there are a number of barriers to screening including privacy and provider availability. While self-collected extra-genital STI samples have the potential to mitigate some of these barriers, this approach has not yet achieved widespread use. This study evaluates the implementation of self-collection of extra-genital STI tests at the VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System (VANEOHS), assesses acceptability and measures impact on testing rates. Methods The study included people with HIV (PWH) and patients on PrEP at the VANEOHS’s infectious diseases clinic and covered 10 Ohio counties. Patients chose between self- and provider-collection. We followed GC and CT rectal and pharyngeal testing frequency and test completion rates and characterized reasons for unsuccessful completion. We also compared extra-genital GC/CT testing rates before and after the availability of self-collection. Finally, we deployed an anonymous survey to assess acceptability of self-collection and ease of use. We used descriptive statistics to report completion rates, survey findings and changes in rates of testing over time. Results Of the 276 tests ordered for self-collection for 95 unique veterans, 82 pharyngeal and 60 rectal GC/CT rectal tests were successfully completed and interpreted in the first 8 months of the study (Table 1). The testing rate increased from 8 tests/month to 15 tests/month for pharyngeal GC/CT and from 6 tests/month to 10 tests/month for rectal GC/CT (Figure 1). Of the survey respondents who performed self-collection, 11 of 17 were satisfied or very satisfied with self-collection and most found it easy or very easy to swab their own rectum (9/12) and throat (13/14) (Table 2). Conclusion Self-sample collection for extra-genital testing is feasible in a large healthcare network. It is highly desired by patients and has the potential to improve access and improve STI screening rates. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Oregon Health & Science University (US), VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System (US), University School (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.