P-240. Comparing Infection Rates Against Mechanical Complications By Site of Placement of Central Venous Catheters in the ICU, a Moot Point Based on Excessive Mortality?

Abstract Background In the ICU the decision regarding site selection for central venous catheters (CVC) is largely influenced by the historic infection rates by site. It is thought that femoral placement has the highest incidence of line infections and therefore is often avoided. However, few studies have aimed to look at the overall risk to the patient regarding site placement taking not only risk of infection, but also risk of mechanical injury and complications into consideration. Methods We did a retrospective review of all patients who had a new central line (either triple lumen catheter or hemodialysis catheter) placed in the ICU for any indication between 1/31/2022 - 5/4/2023. Key information including demographics, Charlson Comorbidity index, type of catheter, site, date of insertion, and date of removal was obtained. Manual chart review was done for each patient in order to ascertain presence of CLABSI as well as mechanical complications. Results 472 lines were placed during the study period. The average age was 63.5 years. The average Charlson Comorbidity index was 5. There was no statistical significant difference in infection rates among femoral 5/196 (2.5%) and internal jugular (IJ) 9/247 (3.6%) CVCs, although IJ lines had a trend towards higher rates of mechanical complications 21/247 (8.5%) vs 11/195 (5.6%), respectively. Rate of infection was twice as high, 6/267 (2.3%) vs 9/205 (4.4%) in the BMI >30 group vs those with a BMI < 30. The 6-month all-cause mortality for patients requiring a central line in the ICU was >80%, regardless of the site of placement, presence of line infection, or mechanical complication. Conclusion Infection rates between IJ and femoral lines were comparable. Femoral lines had numerically less mechanical complications as compared to IJ lines. BMI > 30 had a trend towards an increased risk of CLABSI. Overall mortality was > 80% for patients who required a CVC for any reason in the ICU setting. Clinicians should take a balanced approach regarding infection and mechanical complication risk when placing a central line. Further research into determining infection rates for patients with higher BMI is needed. Intensivists should consider early palliative care consultation for patients requiring a central line. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.444
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-240. Comparing Infection Rates Against Mechanical Complications By Site of Placement of Central Venous Catheters in the ICU, a Moot Point Based on Excessive Mortality?

P Kinsella, Arjun Patel, Michael T. Stevens, Rafael Ponce
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

P-240. Comparing Infection Rates Against Mechanical Complications By Site of Placement of Central Venous Catheters in the ICU, a Moot Point Based on Excessive Mortality?

P Kinsella, Arjun Patel, Michael T. Stevens, Rafael Ponce
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In the ICU the decision regarding site selection for central venous catheters (CVC) is largely influenced by the historic infection rates by site. It is thought that femoral placement has the highest incidence of line infections and therefore is often avoided. However, few studies have aimed to look at the overall risk to the patient regarding site placement taking not only risk of infection, but also risk of mechanical injury and complications into consideration. Methods We did a retrospective review of all patients who had a new central line (either triple lumen catheter or hemodialysis catheter) placed in the ICU for any indication between 1/31/2022 - 5/4/2023. Key information including demographics, Charlson Comorbidity index, type of catheter, site, date of insertion, and date of removal was obtained. Manual chart review was done for each patient in order to ascertain presence of CLABSI as well as mechanical complications. Results 472 lines were placed during the study period. The average age was 63.5 years. The average Charlson Comorbidity index was 5. There was no statistical significant difference in infection rates among femoral 5/196 (2.5%) and internal jugular (IJ) 9/247 (3.6%) CVCs, although IJ lines had a trend towards higher rates of mechanical complications 21/247 (8.5%) vs 11/195 (5.6%), respectively. Rate of infection was twice as high, 6/267 (2.3%) vs 9/205 (4.4%) in the BMI >30 group vs those with a BMI < 30. The 6-month all-cause mortality for patients requiring a central line in the ICU was >80%, regardless of the site of placement, presence of line infection, or mechanical complication. Conclusion Infection rates between IJ and femoral lines were comparable. Femoral lines had numerically less mechanical complications as compared to IJ lines. BMI > 30 had a trend towards an increased risk of CLABSI. Overall mortality was > 80% for patients who required a CVC for any reason in the ICU setting. Clinicians should take a balanced approach regarding infection and mechanical complication risk when placing a central line. Further research into determining infection rates for patients with higher BMI is needed. Intensivists should consider early palliative care consultation for patients requiring a central line. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Mercer University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.