P-2059. Perceptions and Factors Associated with Uptake of Monovalent XBB.1.5 BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine among Healthcare Workers in Peru

Abstract Background The implementation of the XBB.1.5 BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine (updated vaccine) occurred in Peru in January 2024, since then, many questions about its efficacy and safety have been raised. Addressing these concerns is crucial, especially among healthcare workers, given their high risk of acquiring COVID-19 and their role in promoting vaccination. This study investigated the factors and perceptions associated with healthcare workers’ uptake of the updated vaccine.Figure 1:Perceptions about the updated monovalent vaccine among healthcare workers in Peru Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study based on an online survey from March 21 to May 1, 2024. Healthcare workers (physicians, nurses, etc.) living and practicing in Peru were included. We calculated crude prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals to determine the associated factors and perceptions using Poisson regression with robust variance.Table 1:Factors associated with uptake of the updated monovalent vaccine among healthcare workers (Page 1) Results We included 393 healthcare workers, predominantly female (55.2%) and physicians (63.9%), almost half aged 30-49 years (50.9%). The majority (72.8%) reported not being vaccinated with the updated vaccine, but 65% of them intended to do it. Regarding perceptions, more than 70% of respondents thought the updated vaccine was necessary and protective against severe COVID-19 and mortality, but only 16.5% believed it caused severe adverse events. Only 24.7% felt the Peruvian Ministry of Health was informing well about the vaccines (Figure 1). In the bivariate analysis, the uptake of this vaccine was significantly higher among those who had a history of COVID-19 (p = 0.005), had received the bivalent vaccine (p< 0.001), or more than five vaccine doses (p< 0.001), and among those who felt the vaccine should be recommended (p=0.015) or even mandatory for high-risk people (p=0.04). On the other hand, the uptake was lower in those who thought the vaccine was not necessary (p=0.043) or did not protect against mortality (p=0.037) (Table 1).Table 1:Factors associated with uptake of the updated monovalent vaccine among healthcare workers (Page 2) Conclusion History of COVID-19, receiving multiple vaccine doses, and recommending the updated vaccine for high-risk people are factors associated with vaccine uptake. There are still major concerns about the government's communication regarding vaccination. These findings underscore the importance of targeted interventions and communication strategies to improve the poor vaccination rate among healthcare workers in Peru.Table 1:Factors associated with uptake of the updated monovalent vaccine among healthcare workers (Page 3) Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2215
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2059. Perceptions and Factors Associated with Uptake of Monovalent XBB.1.5 BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine among Healthcare Workers in Peru

Brando Ortiz-Saavedra, Carlos Quispe‐Vicuña, María Desamparados Cervera García, Jorge Alave et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

P-2059. Perceptions and Factors Associated with Uptake of Monovalent XBB.1.5 BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine among Healthcare Workers in Peru

Brando Ortiz-Saavedra, Carlos Quispe‐Vicuña, María Desamparados Cervera García, Jorge Alave, Anderson N. Soriano-Moreno, Julieta M. Araoz-Salinas, Jose Armando Gonzales Zamora, Hans Baltazar-Ñahui
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The implementation of the XBB.1.5 BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine (updated vaccine) occurred in Peru in January 2024, since then, many questions about its efficacy and safety have been raised. Addressing these concerns is crucial, especially among healthcare workers, given their high risk of acquiring COVID-19 and their role in promoting vaccination. This study investigated the factors and perceptions associated with healthcare workers’ uptake of the updated vaccine.Figure 1:Perceptions about the updated monovalent vaccine among healthcare workers in Peru Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study based on an online survey from March 21 to May 1, 2024. Healthcare workers (physicians, nurses, etc.) living and practicing in Peru were included. We calculated crude prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals to determine the associated factors and perceptions using Poisson regression with robust variance.Table 1:Factors associated with uptake of the updated monovalent vaccine among healthcare workers (Page 1) Results We included 393 healthcare workers, predominantly female (55.2%) and physicians (63.9%), almost half aged 30-49 years (50.9%). The majority (72.8%) reported not being vaccinated with the updated vaccine, but 65% of them intended to do it. Regarding perceptions, more than 70% of respondents thought the updated vaccine was necessary and protective against severe COVID-19 and mortality, but only 16.5% believed it caused severe adverse events. Only 24.7% felt the Peruvian Ministry of Health was informing well about the vaccines (Figure 1). In the bivariate analysis, the uptake of this vaccine was significantly higher among those who had a history of COVID-19 (p = 0.005), had received the bivalent vaccine (p< 0.001), or more than five vaccine doses (p< 0.001), and among those who felt the vaccine should be recommended (p=0.015) or even mandatory for high-risk people (p=0.04). On the other hand, the uptake was lower in those who thought the vaccine was not necessary (p=0.043) or did not protect against mortality (p=0.037) (Table 1).Table 1:Factors associated with uptake of the updated monovalent vaccine among healthcare workers (Page 2) Conclusion History of COVID-19, receiving multiple vaccine doses, and recommending the updated vaccine for high-risk people are factors associated with vaccine uptake. There are still major concerns about the government's communication regarding vaccination. These findings underscore the importance of targeted interventions and communication strategies to improve the poor vaccination rate among healthcare workers in Peru.Table 1:Factors associated with uptake of the updated monovalent vaccine among healthcare workers (Page 3) Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
University of Miami (US), National University of San Marcos (PE), Universidad Nacional de San Agustin de Arequipa (PE), Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana (PE), American Medical Research (US), Universidad Peruana Unión (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.