P-843. Enhancing Bacteremia Mortality Predictions: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models Across Databases

Abstract Background Bacteremia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitals, and multiple scoring mechanisms have been developed to help with risk assessment. In the setting of bacteremia, the Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) has been used. This study develops ML models to predict mortality in bacteremic patients, comparing their performance against the PBS. Characteristics of Patients ECI: Elixhauser Comorbidity Index Methods We retrospectively identified patients aged over 18 years who developed bacteremia in the Houston Methodist Hospital System (HMH) from June 2016 to June 2023. True bacteremia was defined based on CDC definitions. MIMIC-IV data, a comprehensive, de-identified electronic health record (EHR) database of critical care patients from Boston, USA, served as an external validation dataset. We recorded maximally perturbed values of 34 clinical and laboratory variables within 48 hours before the first bacteremia. Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation chain equation (MICE) method after preprocessing datasets. Each dataset was split into 70:30 training and test datasets. Models including PBS, Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), LightGBM (LGBM), and XGBoost (XGB), along with hyperparameter tuning via Optuna, were used in classification tasks to predict 30-day all-cause mortality. AUROCs (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics) for each model on test dataset were created, and they were statistically compared with DeLong’s tests. Probability cutoffs for each model were decided to maintain a specificity close to 95%. Model Performance of ML Models and Pitts Score against Mortality Results Across HMH and MIMIC-IV, 21,972 and 2,439 patients experienced BSIs, respectively. Table 1 summarizes characteristics of the patients. E. coli and Enterococcus spp. were the most common pathogens in HMH and MIMIC-IV, respectively. S. aureus made up 17% of bacteremia. All the ML models exhibited higher AUROCs than that of the PBS. LGBM and XGB achieved the highest AUROCs of 0.878 and 0.824, respectively, surpassing PBS (p < 0.05). Conclusion ML models demonstrated higher AUROC and superior performance than that of PBS. ML allows for vast quantities of input data. This ability to process and integrate diverse features may contribute to personalized medicine in infectious diseases. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1035
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-843. Enhancing Bacteremia Mortality Predictions: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models Across Databases

Ashton A. Connor, César A. Arias, Max W. Adelman, Stefano Casarin et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

P-843. Enhancing Bacteremia Mortality Predictions: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models Across Databases

Ashton A. Connor, César A. Arias, Max W. Adelman, Stefano Casarin, Masayuki Nigo, German Contreras, James Kurian
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Bacteremia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitals, and multiple scoring mechanisms have been developed to help with risk assessment. In the setting of bacteremia, the Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) has been used. This study develops ML models to predict mortality in bacteremic patients, comparing their performance against the PBS. Characteristics of Patients ECI: Elixhauser Comorbidity Index Methods We retrospectively identified patients aged over 18 years who developed bacteremia in the Houston Methodist Hospital System (HMH) from June 2016 to June 2023. True bacteremia was defined based on CDC definitions. MIMIC-IV data, a comprehensive, de-identified electronic health record (EHR) database of critical care patients from Boston, USA, served as an external validation dataset. We recorded maximally perturbed values of 34 clinical and laboratory variables within 48 hours before the first bacteremia. Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation chain equation (MICE) method after preprocessing datasets. Each dataset was split into 70:30 training and test datasets. Models including PBS, Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), LightGBM (LGBM), and XGBoost (XGB), along with hyperparameter tuning via Optuna, were used in classification tasks to predict 30-day all-cause mortality. AUROCs (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics) for each model on test dataset were created, and they were statistically compared with DeLong’s tests. Probability cutoffs for each model were decided to maintain a specificity close to 95%. Model Performance of ML Models and Pitts Score against Mortality Results Across HMH and MIMIC-IV, 21,972 and 2,439 patients experienced BSIs, respectively. Table 1 summarizes characteristics of the patients. E. coli and Enterococcus spp. were the most common pathogens in HMH and MIMIC-IV, respectively. S. aureus made up 17% of bacteremia. All the ML models exhibited higher AUROCs than that of the PBS. LGBM and XGB achieved the highest AUROCs of 0.878 and 0.824, respectively, surpassing PBS (p < 0.05). Conclusion ML models demonstrated higher AUROC and superior performance than that of PBS. ML allows for vast quantities of input data. This ability to process and integrate diverse features may contribute to personalized medicine in infectious diseases. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Houston Methodist (US), Cornell University (US), Methodist Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.