210. Implementation of a Pharmacist Driven Beta-lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Program with Daily Result Reporting: Initial Experiences and Challenges Faced

Abstract Background Beta-lactam (BL) antibiotics are a cornerstone of treatment for patients with serious infections. Individualized BL dosing using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is an emerging approach to address variability in BL exposure that adversely impacts PK/PD; however, challenges can emerge when implementing TDM programs in the real-world. We sought to characterize the implementation of a BL TDM program by describing initial successes and challenges. Methods In September 2023, we implemented a front-line pharmacist driven BL TDM clinical protocol (Figure 1) with daily result reporting for the following BLs: cefepime (FEP), meropenem (MEM), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). Patients with FEP, MEM, and TZP plasma TDM data analyzed between September 26th, 2023 and March 31st, 2024 were included. TDM results were interpreted using Bayesian analysis (InsightRX). For each TDM event, we characterized ordering provider specialty, whether or not TDM was performed per protocol, whether or not changes were made in response to TDM results, Bayesian model fitness, treatment indication, culture information, and PK/PD target attainment [including predicted steady state trough concentration (Ctrss) and fT> 1xMIC and fT> 4xMIC]. Results Eighty-two BL TDM levels were obtained in 47 patients. FEP was most frequently monitored (70.7%). Model fit was good or intermediate in > 95% of cases (Table 1). The most common treatment indications were HAP/VAP (n=12, 25.5%), surgical prophylaxis (n=6, 12.8%), bone/joint (n=6, 12.8%), and CNS infection (n=6, 12.8%) (Table 2). Dose adjustments were made in 34% (n=16) of patients. In 57.4% of patients the level order or dose-adjustment deviated from recommended protocols. Targets of 100% fT> MIC and 100% fT> 4xMIC were achieved in 91.5% and 61.7% of patients, respectively (Table 3). Ctrss was above goal in 21% of patients. Conclusion We found that > 90% of patients undergoing BL TDM achieved 100% fT> MIC, whereas nearly 40% failed to achieve 100% fT> 4xMIC at baseline, and > 20% had a Ctrss exceeding safety goals. BL TDM resulted in dose or agent change over 60% of the time, but protocol deviations in dose adjustment were common. The frequency of interventions observed underscores the potential clinical impact of BL TDM on a broader scale when daily reporting is available. Disclosures Nathaniel J. Rhodes, PharmD MS, Apothecademy, LLC: Advisor/Consultant

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.068
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

210. Implementation of a Pharmacist Driven Beta-lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Program with Daily Result Reporting: Initial Experiences and Challenges Faced

Samantha Pan, Nathaniel J. Rhodes, Shannon Galvin, Erin Weslander et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

210. Implementation of a Pharmacist Driven Beta-lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Program with Daily Result Reporting: Initial Experiences and Challenges Faced

Samantha Pan, Nathaniel J. Rhodes, Shannon Galvin, Erin Weslander, Sarah Fierak
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Beta-lactam (BL) antibiotics are a cornerstone of treatment for patients with serious infections. Individualized BL dosing using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is an emerging approach to address variability in BL exposure that adversely impacts PK/PD; however, challenges can emerge when implementing TDM programs in the real-world. We sought to characterize the implementation of a BL TDM program by describing initial successes and challenges. Methods In September 2023, we implemented a front-line pharmacist driven BL TDM clinical protocol (Figure 1) with daily result reporting for the following BLs: cefepime (FEP), meropenem (MEM), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). Patients with FEP, MEM, and TZP plasma TDM data analyzed between September 26th, 2023 and March 31st, 2024 were included. TDM results were interpreted using Bayesian analysis (InsightRX). For each TDM event, we characterized ordering provider specialty, whether or not TDM was performed per protocol, whether or not changes were made in response to TDM results, Bayesian model fitness, treatment indication, culture information, and PK/PD target attainment [including predicted steady state trough concentration (Ctrss) and fT> 1xMIC and fT> 4xMIC]. Results Eighty-two BL TDM levels were obtained in 47 patients. FEP was most frequently monitored (70.7%). Model fit was good or intermediate in > 95% of cases (Table 1). The most common treatment indications were HAP/VAP (n=12, 25.5%), surgical prophylaxis (n=6, 12.8%), bone/joint (n=6, 12.8%), and CNS infection (n=6, 12.8%) (Table 2). Dose adjustments were made in 34% (n=16) of patients. In 57.4% of patients the level order or dose-adjustment deviated from recommended protocols. Targets of 100% fT> MIC and 100% fT> 4xMIC were achieved in 91.5% and 61.7% of patients, respectively (Table 3). Ctrss was above goal in 21% of patients. Conclusion We found that > 90% of patients undergoing BL TDM achieved 100% fT> MIC, whereas nearly 40% failed to achieve 100% fT> 4xMIC at baseline, and > 20% had a Ctrss exceeding safety goals. BL TDM resulted in dose or agent change over 60% of the time, but protocol deviations in dose adjustment were common. The frequency of interventions observed underscores the potential clinical impact of BL TDM on a broader scale when daily reporting is available. Disclosures Nathaniel J. Rhodes, PharmD MS, Apothecademy, LLC: Advisor/Consultant

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Northwestern University (US), Midwestern University (US), Northwestern Memorial Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.