Implementation Determinants of PrEP and Behavioral Health Treatment Referral among HIV Test Counselors

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), an effective biomedical prevention intervention, is not sufficiently reaching populations experiencing high HIV incidence. Behavioral health (BH) treatment addressing mental health and substance use similarly requires increased reach to HIV-affected populations. HIV testing is an opportunity to refer individuals to PrEP and BH treatment. This study, conducted in Miami-Dade County, FL, a domestic HIV epicenter, aimed to assess (1) self-reported rates at which HIV test counselors refer clients to PrEP and BH treatment, (2) barriers and facilitators to PrEP and BH treatment referral, and (3) the relationship between barriers and facilitators and test counselors' referral rates. Among 127 HIV test counselors, the average PrEP referral rate was 63.8% (SD = 41.5) of those potentially meeting PrEP indications. Insufficient time was associated with lower PrEP referral (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.99, p = 0.023) and training in PrEP screening was associated with higher rates of PrEP referral (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.98-1.64, p = 0.034). The average BH treatment referral rate was 52.7% (SD = 44.4) of clients who the counselor felt would potentially benefit from treatment. Counselors lacking knowledge of screening (OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2-0.78, p = 0.004), referral procedures (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.23-0.87, p = 0.008), or locations to refer clients (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25-0.86, p = 0.008), as well as those with higher caseloads (OR: 0.998, 95% CI: 0.997-0.999, p < 0.001) were less likely to refer for BH. Training in substance use screening (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.96-1.64, p = 0.046) and referral (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.99-1.66, p = 0.029) were associated with increased BH referral. Implementation strategies are needed to address key barriers to PrEP and BH referrals in HIV testing contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIDS and Behavior
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-025-04620-2
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation Determinants of PrEP and Behavioral Health Treatment Referral among HIV Test Counselors

Daniel J. Feaster, Steven A. Safren, Raymond R. Balise, DeAnne Turner et al.
AIDS and Behavior
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Implementation Determinants of PrEP and Behavioral Health Treatment Referral among HIV Test Counselors

Daniel J. Feaster, Steven A. Safren, Raymond R. Balise, DeAnne Turner, Audrey Harkness, Vanessa Morales, Nequiel Reyes, Kyle Grealis
article en

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), an effective biomedical prevention intervention, is not sufficiently reaching populations experiencing high HIV incidence. Behavioral health (BH) treatment addressing mental health and substance use similarly requires increased reach to HIV-affected populations. HIV testing is an opportunity to refer individuals to PrEP and BH treatment. This study, conducted in Miami-Dade County, FL, a domestic HIV epicenter, aimed to assess (1) self-reported rates at which HIV test counselors refer clients to PrEP and BH treatment, (2) barriers and facilitators to PrEP and BH treatment referral, and (3) the relationship between barriers and facilitators and test counselors' referral rates. Among 127 HIV test counselors, the average PrEP referral rate was 63.8% (SD = 41.5) of those potentially meeting PrEP indications. Insufficient time was associated with lower PrEP referral (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.99, p = 0.023) and training in PrEP screening was associated with higher rates of PrEP referral (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.98-1.64, p = 0.034). The average BH treatment referral rate was 52.7% (SD = 44.4) of clients who the counselor felt would potentially benefit from treatment. Counselors lacking knowledge of screening (OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2-0.78, p = 0.004), referral procedures (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.23-0.87, p = 0.008), or locations to refer clients (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25-0.86, p = 0.008), as well as those with higher caseloads (OR: 0.998, 95% CI: 0.997-0.999, p < 0.001) were less likely to refer for BH. Training in substance use screening (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.96-1.64, p = 0.046) and referral (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.99-1.66, p = 0.029) were associated with increased BH referral. Implementation strategies are needed to address key barriers to PrEP and BH referrals in HIV testing contexts.

AIDS and BehaviorVol. 29(5)
University of Miami (US), University of South Florida (US)
National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.