P-1909. Social Connectedness in the COVID-19 Pandemic’s Aftermath: The Influence of Disease Status

Abstract Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, maintaining social connectedness became difficult.As the pandemic receded, these challenges eased and allowed people to re-develop their social relationships. However, those with Long COVID (LC) may experience ongoing difficulties given the effects of their illness, but limited research has examined the association of LC with social connectedness. Methods The US Census Bureau Household Pulse Survey data was used in this analysis. Data was collected online between January 9 - February 5, 2024, in English and Spanish. Sample size was N=68,544. Social connectedness metrics were compared between those reporting LC, COVID-19 infection that had resolved (Short COVID, or SC), and those who had not experienced COVID (No COVID, or NC). Data were analyzed using χ2 and between group contrast analysis. Results When asked how often they feel lonely, those with LC were significantly more likely to say always, usually, or sometimes as compared to SC and NC respondents and less likely to say rarely or never (all comparisons to LC p< .05). In terms of receiving necessary social and emotional support, only 21.6% of those with LC said they always get necessary support, vs. 30.9% for SC and 30.0% for NC (both LC comparisons p< .05). LC respondents were most likely to say they got together with friends or relatives less than once per week (47.1%, vs. 35.3% SC and 43.1% NC, all comparisons p< .05). Those experiencing SC were most likely to say they texted with friends, family or neighbors 5+ times per week (70.1%), followed by LC (65.1%), then NC (59.9%, all comparisons p< .05). Conclusion People suffering from LC generally exhibited lower levels of social connectedness and had lower likelihood of obtaining necessary social and emotional support than those who experienced SC or NC. Additional research should be conducted to better understand the causal connections: are people with poorer social connections more likely to experience LC, does LC damage the ability to become or remain socially connected, or both? More research is needed to examine these questions and develop programs to help rebuild and retain social connections in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2070
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1909. Social Connectedness in the COVID-19 Pandemic’s Aftermath: The Influence of Disease Status

Christopher Kricorian
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Zoonotic diseases and public health
article

P-1909. Social Connectedness in the COVID-19 Pandemic’s Aftermath: The Influence of Disease Status

Christopher Kricorian
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, maintaining social connectedness became difficult.As the pandemic receded, these challenges eased and allowed people to re-develop their social relationships. However, those with Long COVID (LC) may experience ongoing difficulties given the effects of their illness, but limited research has examined the association of LC with social connectedness. Methods The US Census Bureau Household Pulse Survey data was used in this analysis. Data was collected online between January 9 - February 5, 2024, in English and Spanish. Sample size was N=68,544. Social connectedness metrics were compared between those reporting LC, COVID-19 infection that had resolved (Short COVID, or SC), and those who had not experienced COVID (No COVID, or NC). Data were analyzed using χ2 and between group contrast analysis. Results When asked how often they feel lonely, those with LC were significantly more likely to say always, usually, or sometimes as compared to SC and NC respondents and less likely to say rarely or never (all comparisons to LC p< .05). In terms of receiving necessary social and emotional support, only 21.6% of those with LC said they always get necessary support, vs. 30.9% for SC and 30.0% for NC (both LC comparisons p< .05). LC respondents were most likely to say they got together with friends or relatives less than once per week (47.1%, vs. 35.3% SC and 43.1% NC, all comparisons p< .05). Those experiencing SC were most likely to say they texted with friends, family or neighbors 5+ times per week (70.1%), followed by LC (65.1%), then NC (59.9%, all comparisons p< .05). Conclusion People suffering from LC generally exhibited lower levels of social connectedness and had lower likelihood of obtaining necessary social and emotional support than those who experienced SC or NC. Additional research should be conducted to better understand the causal connections: are people with poorer social connections more likely to experience LC, does LC damage the ability to become or remain socially connected, or both? More research is needed to examine these questions and develop programs to help rebuild and retain social connections in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Adventist Health Simi Valley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.