P-845. HECK-Yes This is The Remix!! Ceftriaxone vs Cefepime or Carbapenems for Definitive Treatment of Low-Risk AmpC-Harboring Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infections

Abstract Background Recent literature suggests ceftriaxone as a viable treatment of low-risk AmpC-producing organisms, allowing for the preservation of AmpC-stable therapies for moderate to high-risk organisms. This study aimed to determine whether ceftriaxone is effective in patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by low-risk AmpC harboring Enterobacterales compared to AmpC-stable therapies. Methods This was an IRB-approved, retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients ≥18 years old with a BSI due to Serratia marcescens, Morganella morganii, or Providencia spp. from 1/1/2017-2/28/2024. Patients were compared according to definitive therapy with ceftriaxone vs AmpC stable therapy (cefepime or carbapenem). The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were clinical failure, development of ceftriaxone resistance, and hospital length of stay (LOS) after index culture. Clinical failure was defined as persistent signs and symptoms of infection, repeat positive blood cultures on days 3-5 of therapy, antibiotic escalation, or death. Results 163 patients were included: 54 (33.1%) received ceftriaxone vs 109 (66.9%) AmpC stable therapies. Baseline, infection, and treatment characteristics are found in Table 1. 30-day all-cause mortality was observed in 5 (9.3%) ceftriaxone vs 11 (10.1%) AmpC stable patients (P=0.87). There were no differences in clinical success (49 [90.7%] vs 86 [78.9%], P=0.059), relapsing infection (3 [5.6%] vs 10 [9.3%], P=0.55), or rehospitalization (11 [20.4%] vs 38 [34.9%], P=0.06) between ceftriaxone and AmpC stable patients, respectively. Ceftriaxone resistance was only observed in AmpC stable patients (0 vs. 4 [3.7%], P=0.302), and median (IQR) LOS was similar between groups (5 [4-8] vs 6 [3-13] days, P=0.39). After adjustment for vasopressor use (adjOR 4.2; 95%CI, 1.3-13.1), ceftriaxone definitive therapy (adjOR, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.23-2.3) was not independently associated with 30-day all-cause mortality Conclusion Patients treated with definitive ceftriaxone for low-risk AmpC Enterobacterales BSI achieved comparable outcomes to those treated with AmpC stable therapies. These findings support ceftriaxone as a treatment option for low-risk AmpC producers. Disclosures Rachel M. Kenney, PharmD, BCIDP, Medtronic Inc: Spouse is an employee, stockholder

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1037
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-845. HECK-Yes This is The Remix!! Ceftriaxone vs Cefepime or Carbapenems for Definitive Treatment of Low-Risk AmpC-Harboring Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infections

Rachel M. Kenney, Michael P. Veve, Anita Shallal, Robert Tibbetts et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

P-845. HECK-Yes This is The Remix!! Ceftriaxone vs Cefepime or Carbapenems for Definitive Treatment of Low-Risk AmpC-Harboring Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infections

Rachel M. Kenney, Michael P. Veve, Anita Shallal, Robert Tibbetts, Jessica L Mulbah
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent literature suggests ceftriaxone as a viable treatment of low-risk AmpC-producing organisms, allowing for the preservation of AmpC-stable therapies for moderate to high-risk organisms. This study aimed to determine whether ceftriaxone is effective in patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by low-risk AmpC harboring Enterobacterales compared to AmpC-stable therapies. Methods This was an IRB-approved, retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients ≥18 years old with a BSI due to Serratia marcescens, Morganella morganii, or Providencia spp. from 1/1/2017-2/28/2024. Patients were compared according to definitive therapy with ceftriaxone vs AmpC stable therapy (cefepime or carbapenem). The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were clinical failure, development of ceftriaxone resistance, and hospital length of stay (LOS) after index culture. Clinical failure was defined as persistent signs and symptoms of infection, repeat positive blood cultures on days 3-5 of therapy, antibiotic escalation, or death. Results 163 patients were included: 54 (33.1%) received ceftriaxone vs 109 (66.9%) AmpC stable therapies. Baseline, infection, and treatment characteristics are found in Table 1. 30-day all-cause mortality was observed in 5 (9.3%) ceftriaxone vs 11 (10.1%) AmpC stable patients (P=0.87). There were no differences in clinical success (49 [90.7%] vs 86 [78.9%], P=0.059), relapsing infection (3 [5.6%] vs 10 [9.3%], P=0.55), or rehospitalization (11 [20.4%] vs 38 [34.9%], P=0.06) between ceftriaxone and AmpC stable patients, respectively. Ceftriaxone resistance was only observed in AmpC stable patients (0 vs. 4 [3.7%], P=0.302), and median (IQR) LOS was similar between groups (5 [4-8] vs 6 [3-13] days, P=0.39). After adjustment for vasopressor use (adjOR 4.2; 95%CI, 1.3-13.1), ceftriaxone definitive therapy (adjOR, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.23-2.3) was not independently associated with 30-day all-cause mortality Conclusion Patients treated with definitive ceftriaxone for low-risk AmpC Enterobacterales BSI achieved comparable outcomes to those treated with AmpC stable therapies. These findings support ceftriaxone as a treatment option for low-risk AmpC producers. Disclosures Rachel M. Kenney, PharmD, BCIDP, Medtronic Inc: Spouse is an employee, stockholder

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Henry Ford Health System (US), Henry Ford Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.