P-1910. Long COVID Resolution Status and Health Impacts

Abstract Background Many Americans continue to experience Long COVID (LC), which can affect a broad range of physical and mental functions. Understanding symptom prevalence is important to developing public health response. Methods An online survey was conducted by the US Census Bureau (N=68,544). Self-reported health metrics (mobility, seeing, hearing and concentration) were compared between those reporting unresolved LC (LC-U), resolved LC (LC-R), previous short COVID (SC), and those not contracting COVID (NC). Data were analyzed using χ2 and between group contrast analysis. Results Among those surveyed, 42.2% experienced SC, 41.3% did not experience COVID-19 (NC), 9.7% experienced LC-R, and 6.8% had LC-U. At least some mobility impairment was reported by 28.7% of NC respondents and 27.6% of LC-R (ns). LC-U reported significantly greater mobility impairment (38.1%, p< .05) and SC reported less (15.8%, p< .05). LC-U were most likely to report difficulty seeing (46.8%), followed by LC-R (37.2%), NC (30.5%), and SC (23.3%) (all comparisons p< .05). NC (19.5%) and LC-R (19.6%) were about equally likely to report any hearing difficulty (ns). LC-U reported significantly greater difficulty hearing (27.0%, p< .05) and SC reported significantly less (15.0%, p< .05). LC-U were most likely to report any difficulty concentrating or remembering (55.1%), followed by LC-R (40.4%), NC (28.9%) and SC (22.2%, all comparisons p< .05). Conclusion LC-U respondents reported the greatest difficulty across all four variables while SCreported the least. NC and LC-R reported similar hearing and mobility challenges, but LC-R performed worse than NC on seeing and concentration. It seems paradoxical that SC respondents reported fewer challenges than NC, but perhaps those who experienced SC were healthier to begin with and thus less vigilant about avoiding COVID. Despite claiming resolved LC, LC-R still reported worse seeing and concentration than both SC and NC (albeit better than LC-U). Additional research is needed to examine both the factors associated with contracting LC and the long-term effects that may remain even after people believe they have recovered from LC. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2071
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1910. Long COVID Resolution Status and Health Impacts

Christopher Kricorian
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

P-1910. Long COVID Resolution Status and Health Impacts

Christopher Kricorian
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Many Americans continue to experience Long COVID (LC), which can affect a broad range of physical and mental functions. Understanding symptom prevalence is important to developing public health response. Methods An online survey was conducted by the US Census Bureau (N=68,544). Self-reported health metrics (mobility, seeing, hearing and concentration) were compared between those reporting unresolved LC (LC-U), resolved LC (LC-R), previous short COVID (SC), and those not contracting COVID (NC). Data were analyzed using χ2 and between group contrast analysis. Results Among those surveyed, 42.2% experienced SC, 41.3% did not experience COVID-19 (NC), 9.7% experienced LC-R, and 6.8% had LC-U. At least some mobility impairment was reported by 28.7% of NC respondents and 27.6% of LC-R (ns). LC-U reported significantly greater mobility impairment (38.1%, p< .05) and SC reported less (15.8%, p< .05). LC-U were most likely to report difficulty seeing (46.8%), followed by LC-R (37.2%), NC (30.5%), and SC (23.3%) (all comparisons p< .05). NC (19.5%) and LC-R (19.6%) were about equally likely to report any hearing difficulty (ns). LC-U reported significantly greater difficulty hearing (27.0%, p< .05) and SC reported significantly less (15.0%, p< .05). LC-U were most likely to report any difficulty concentrating or remembering (55.1%), followed by LC-R (40.4%), NC (28.9%) and SC (22.2%, all comparisons p< .05). Conclusion LC-U respondents reported the greatest difficulty across all four variables while SCreported the least. NC and LC-R reported similar hearing and mobility challenges, but LC-R performed worse than NC on seeing and concentration. It seems paradoxical that SC respondents reported fewer challenges than NC, but perhaps those who experienced SC were healthier to begin with and thus less vigilant about avoiding COVID. Despite claiming resolved LC, LC-R still reported worse seeing and concentration than both SC and NC (albeit better than LC-U). Additional research is needed to examine both the factors associated with contracting LC and the long-term effects that may remain even after people believe they have recovered from LC. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Adventist Health Simi Valley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.