P-255. Evaluation of automated disinfectant dispenser systems in 6 hospitals demonstrates a need for improved monitoring to ensure that correct disinfectant concentrations are delivered

Abstract Background Automated dispensers that dilute concentrated disinfectants with water are commonly used in healthcare facilities. However, most facilities do not perform routine monitoring to ensure that the dispensers are functioning correctly and being used as recommended by the manufacturer.Table 1.Concentrations of disinfectant measured in samples obtained from automated dispensers and from in-use buckets on environmental services carts in 6 hospitalsQA, quaternary ammonium disinfectant; PA, peracetic acid-based disinfectant.a. Expected concentrations, ∼1,300 parts per million (PPM) for PA and ∼800 PPM for QA; higher-than-expected concentration of peracetic acid, >1,800 ppm; b. Lower than expected concentration, 300-900 PPM for PA and 200-400 PPM for QA; cNo disinfectant detected, limit of detection (∼300 PPM for PA and ∼150 PPM for QA); d. Wrong product, the in-use product that was supposed to be PA or QA was a detergent intended for floors. Methods In 6 acute care hospitals in Northeast Ohio, we tested disinfectant concentrations and pH of products obtained from automated dispensers and in-use containers from environmental services (EVS) personnel carts. The disinfectants included quaternary ammonium (800 parts per million [ppm]; pH 8) and peracetic acid-based products (∼1300 ppm; pH 3). Results All 6 hospitals had 1 or more malfunctioning dispensers (Table 1). Of 57 systems assessed, 14 (25%) dispensed products with lower-than-expected concentrations, including 8 (14%) with no detectable disinfectant (i.e., water). Nine of 62 (15%) in-use products had no detectable disinfectant, and 4 (7%) were the wrong product (i.e., a detergent for floors used for high-touch surfaces). Reasons for dispenser malfunction included incorrect connection of the concentrate container, dysfunction of a low-product indicator, and failure to change the concentrate container when indicated. pH measurements identified disinfectants with lower-than-expected concentrations, and an intervention that included monitoring was effective in ensuring that the dispensers were operating correctly. Conclusion Improved monitoring of automated disinfectant dispenser systems in healthcare facilities is needed to ensure patient safety. pH measurements could provide a simple means to ensure that dispensers are functioning correctly. Disclosures Elie Saade, MD, MPH, FIDSA, Janssen Global Services: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen Global Services: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen Research and Development: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen Research and Development: Advisor/Consultant Curtis Donskey, MD, Clorox: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.459
Primary Topic
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-255. Evaluation of automated disinfectant dispenser systems in 6 hospitals demonstrates a need for improved monitoring to ensure that correct disinfectant concentrations are delivered

Elie Saade, Amy J. Ray, Jennifer L. Cadnum, Curtis J. Donskey et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
article

P-255. Evaluation of automated disinfectant dispenser systems in 6 hospitals demonstrates a need for improved monitoring to ensure that correct disinfectant concentrations are delivered

Elie Saade, Amy J. Ray, Jennifer L. Cadnum, Curtis J. Donskey, Claire E. Kaple
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Automated dispensers that dilute concentrated disinfectants with water are commonly used in healthcare facilities. However, most facilities do not perform routine monitoring to ensure that the dispensers are functioning correctly and being used as recommended by the manufacturer.Table 1.Concentrations of disinfectant measured in samples obtained from automated dispensers and from in-use buckets on environmental services carts in 6 hospitalsQA, quaternary ammonium disinfectant; PA, peracetic acid-based disinfectant.a. Expected concentrations, ∼1,300 parts per million (PPM) for PA and ∼800 PPM for QA; higher-than-expected concentration of peracetic acid, >1,800 ppm; b. Lower than expected concentration, 300-900 PPM for PA and 200-400 PPM for QA; cNo disinfectant detected, limit of detection (∼300 PPM for PA and ∼150 PPM for QA); d. Wrong product, the in-use product that was supposed to be PA or QA was a detergent intended for floors. Methods In 6 acute care hospitals in Northeast Ohio, we tested disinfectant concentrations and pH of products obtained from automated dispensers and in-use containers from environmental services (EVS) personnel carts. The disinfectants included quaternary ammonium (800 parts per million [ppm]; pH 8) and peracetic acid-based products (∼1300 ppm; pH 3). Results All 6 hospitals had 1 or more malfunctioning dispensers (Table 1). Of 57 systems assessed, 14 (25%) dispensed products with lower-than-expected concentrations, including 8 (14%) with no detectable disinfectant (i.e., water). Nine of 62 (15%) in-use products had no detectable disinfectant, and 4 (7%) were the wrong product (i.e., a detergent for floors used for high-touch surfaces). Reasons for dispenser malfunction included incorrect connection of the concentrate container, dysfunction of a low-product indicator, and failure to change the concentrate container when indicated. pH measurements identified disinfectants with lower-than-expected concentrations, and an intervention that included monitoring was effective in ensuring that the dispensers were operating correctly. Conclusion Improved monitoring of automated disinfectant dispenser systems in healthcare facilities is needed to ensure patient safety. pH measurements could provide a simple means to ensure that dispensers are functioning correctly. Disclosures Elie Saade, MD, MPH, FIDSA, Janssen Global Services: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen Global Services: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen Research and Development: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen Research and Development: Advisor/Consultant Curtis Donskey, MD, Clorox: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
MetroHealth (US), Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (US), VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
OPEC Fund for International Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.