P-256. Development of Novel Clutter and Cleanliness Scales for Infection Prevention and Control in U.S. Home Healthcare Settings

Abstract Background In the U.S., homebound older adults often have multiple chronic conditions thereby increasing their infection risk. For those receiving home health care (HHC), environmental hazards in the home can not only exacerbate infection risk but can also impede effective infection prevention and control (IPC) practices for HHC clinicians, patients and their caregivers. Timely and accurate assessment of environmental risks are crucial. Yet, no tools exist specifically for HHC clinicians to assess infection risk factors in the home environment. To fill this gap, we developed scales to measure clutter and cleanliness in HHC patients’ homes. The clutter and cleanliness rating scale. Methods First, we reviewed existing clutter and cleanliness scales, noting that most validated scales focused on hoarding. We adapted these scales and developed observational items focused on IPC in the home environment. During pilot testing with 15 HHC patients and caregivers from an urban HHC agency, we used a uniform rating scale for both clutter and cleanliness items, which posed challenges due to variable home environments and interviewer biases. Following pilot testing, we refined the scales based on interviewer feedback. To improve coding consistency, interviewers received training using a procedural manual and completed a home observation quiz with example pictures. Results Our revised observational items now have distinct rating scales for cleanliness and clutter. Clutter is rated on percentages of free space to reduce subjectivity, and cleanliness is rated on a scale of visible clean to not clean (Table 1). Even with refinement, there was still difficulty achieving consistent ratings among interviewers, specifically with the middle scale points (mostly and moderately clean; some and moderate clutter). However, after scale revisions and interviewer trainings, home observation quiz responses among interviewers achieved at least 80% consistency. Conclusion Our scales represent the first observational items designed to assess home cleanliness and clutter for IPC purposes. If widely adopted, these scales could enable HHC clinicians to effectively assess environmental hazards, informing patient/caregiver educational needs and enhancing patient safety by reducing infection risks. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.460
Primary Topic
Infection Control in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-256. Development of Novel Clutter and Cleanliness Scales for Infection Prevention and Control in U.S. Home Healthcare Settings

Judith Brasch, Sasha Vergez, Ashley M. Chastain, Nicole Onorato et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Infection Control in Healthcare
article

P-256. Development of Novel Clutter and Cleanliness Scales for Infection Prevention and Control in U.S. Home Healthcare Settings

Judith Brasch, Sasha Vergez, Ashley M. Chastain, Nicole Onorato, Jinjiao Wang, David Russell, Margaret V. McDonald, Evette Ramos, Jingjing Shang, Khadra Dualeh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In the U.S., homebound older adults often have multiple chronic conditions thereby increasing their infection risk. For those receiving home health care (HHC), environmental hazards in the home can not only exacerbate infection risk but can also impede effective infection prevention and control (IPC) practices for HHC clinicians, patients and their caregivers. Timely and accurate assessment of environmental risks are crucial. Yet, no tools exist specifically for HHC clinicians to assess infection risk factors in the home environment. To fill this gap, we developed scales to measure clutter and cleanliness in HHC patients’ homes. The clutter and cleanliness rating scale. Methods First, we reviewed existing clutter and cleanliness scales, noting that most validated scales focused on hoarding. We adapted these scales and developed observational items focused on IPC in the home environment. During pilot testing with 15 HHC patients and caregivers from an urban HHC agency, we used a uniform rating scale for both clutter and cleanliness items, which posed challenges due to variable home environments and interviewer biases. Following pilot testing, we refined the scales based on interviewer feedback. To improve coding consistency, interviewers received training using a procedural manual and completed a home observation quiz with example pictures. Results Our revised observational items now have distinct rating scales for cleanliness and clutter. Clutter is rated on percentages of free space to reduce subjectivity, and cleanliness is rated on a scale of visible clean to not clean (Table 1). Even with refinement, there was still difficulty achieving consistent ratings among interviewers, specifically with the middle scale points (mostly and moderately clean; some and moderate clutter). However, after scale revisions and interviewer trainings, home observation quiz responses among interviewers achieved at least 80% consistency. Conclusion Our scales represent the first observational items designed to assess home cleanliness and clutter for IPC purposes. If widely adopted, these scales could enable HHC clinicians to effectively assess environmental hazards, informing patient/caregiver educational needs and enhancing patient safety by reducing infection risks. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
University of Rochester Medical Center (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Infection Control in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.