593. Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1 Study of the Safety of BPL-1357, A BPL-Inactivated, Whole-Virus, Universal Influenza Vaccine

Abstract Background Better influenza vaccines are needed, not just for seasonal strains but for future pandemic viruses. BPL-1357 is a whole-virus, β-propiolactone-inactivated vaccine containing four wild-type, low-pathogenicity avian influenza viruses (H1N9, H3N8, H5N1, and H7N3). In mice and ferrets, BPL-1357 provided robust protection against challenge with a diverse set of influenza A viruses, including completely heterosubtypic strains. Methods A phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, study was performed in volunteers 18 to 55 years of age using a single dose-level of vaccine given twice 28-days apart, either intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN). Forty-five participants were block randomized (1:1:1) to receive IM BPL-1357 and IN placebo (IM group), IM placebo and IN BPL-1357 (IN group), or IM placebo and IN placebo (placebo group). Adverse events (AEs) were solicited using a questionnaire for 7 days after each vaccination and volunteers had medical follow-up for 182 days after the second vaccine (V2D182). Solicited AEs were presented visually as proportions. AEs were compared using tests of proportions at day 28 (V2D28) and V2D182. Results Forty-five participants were enrolled between June 27, 2022 and November 9, 2022 and randomized into each group (n=15,15,15). Two participants (placebo group) delayed or missed their second dose because they developed COVID-19. No serious AEs were observed. Most AEs were mild. Injection site pain was the most common AE, which occurred in 87%/67% of the IM group after each vaccine dose respectively, but only in 33%/0% of the IN group, and 13%/21% of the placebo group. Other AEs, such as fatigue and headache, were similarly observed across the three groups. There was a severe AE possibly related to the IN vaccine (fever 39-40°C) which occurred after the first dose, but not the second. When comparing intervention-related AEs, only injection site pain was found to occur more frequently in the combined IM+IN group relative to placebo. Conclusion BPL-1357 was safe and well-tolerated. Pain at the injection site was commonly seen in the IM group, though was mostly mild. Other AEs were similar in frequency between vaccine and placebo groups. Further work to determine the immunogenicity and efficacy of BPL-1357 is underway. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.188
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

593. Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1 Study of the Safety of BPL-1357, A BPL-Inactivated, Whole-Virus, Universal Influenza Vaccine

Ian Bellayr, Gregory Mak, Lindsay Czajkowski, Alison Han et al.
2 citations
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Influenza Virus Research Studies
2.71
article

593. Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1 Study of the Safety of BPL-1357, A BPL-Inactivated, Whole-Virus, Universal Influenza Vaccine

Ian Bellayr, Gregory Mak, Lindsay Czajkowski, Alison Han, Kimberly Adao, Matthew J. Memoli, Adriana Cervantes-Medina, Jae-Keun Park, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, Luca T. Giurgea, Viviane Callier, Holly Ann Baus, Sally Hunsberger, Rani Athota, Monica Gouzoulis, Jenna Sherry
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Better influenza vaccines are needed, not just for seasonal strains but for future pandemic viruses. BPL-1357 is a whole-virus, β-propiolactone-inactivated vaccine containing four wild-type, low-pathogenicity avian influenza viruses (H1N9, H3N8, H5N1, and H7N3). In mice and ferrets, BPL-1357 provided robust protection against challenge with a diverse set of influenza A viruses, including completely heterosubtypic strains. Methods A phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, study was performed in volunteers 18 to 55 years of age using a single dose-level of vaccine given twice 28-days apart, either intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN). Forty-five participants were block randomized (1:1:1) to receive IM BPL-1357 and IN placebo (IM group), IM placebo and IN BPL-1357 (IN group), or IM placebo and IN placebo (placebo group). Adverse events (AEs) were solicited using a questionnaire for 7 days after each vaccination and volunteers had medical follow-up for 182 days after the second vaccine (V2D182). Solicited AEs were presented visually as proportions. AEs were compared using tests of proportions at day 28 (V2D28) and V2D182. Results Forty-five participants were enrolled between June 27, 2022 and November 9, 2022 and randomized into each group (n=15,15,15). Two participants (placebo group) delayed or missed their second dose because they developed COVID-19. No serious AEs were observed. Most AEs were mild. Injection site pain was the most common AE, which occurred in 87%/67% of the IM group after each vaccine dose respectively, but only in 33%/0% of the IN group, and 13%/21% of the placebo group. Other AEs, such as fatigue and headache, were similarly observed across the three groups. There was a severe AE possibly related to the IN vaccine (fever 39-40°C) which occurred after the first dose, but not the second. When comparing intervention-related AEs, only injection site pain was found to occur more frequently in the combined IM+IN group relative to placebo. Conclusion BPL-1357 was safe and well-tolerated. Pain at the injection site was commonly seen in the IM group, though was mostly mild. Other AEs were similar in frequency between vaccine and placebo groups. Further work to determine the immunogenicity and efficacy of BPL-1357 is underway. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
National Institutes of Health (US), Virginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine (US), Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.