310. A comparative study on the effectiveness and safety between colistin-based and high-dose ampicillin/sulbactam-based combination therapy for nosocomial pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>

Abstract Background There are differences between IDSA guidance and ESCMID guideline in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). We compared differences in treatment outcomes between the colistin-based and high-dose ampicillin/sulbactam-based regimen in CRAB pneumonia. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients diagnosed with nosocomial pneumonia (clinically defined pneumonia or pneumonia with specific laboratory findings according to the CDC/NHSN surveillance definition) by CRAB (with a meropenem MIC ≥16ug/ml, colistin MIC 1 ≤ug/ml, and ampicillin/sulbactam MIC ≥4ug/ml) in a university-affiliated hospital in Korea. The study enrolled those who received colistin-based regimen using a loading dose of colistin followed by a maintenance dose (June 2021 to May 2022) and high-dose ampicillin/sulbactam-based regimen using sulbactam 9g/day (October 2022 to September 2023). The primary outcome (all-cause mortality within 28 days) and secondary outcomes (including 14-day/28-day clinical success rates and 14-day/28-day kidney injury -RIFLE score) between the two groups were compared using a Log-binomial regression. Results A total of 170 CRAB pneumonia patients were enrolled in the study, including 87 patients receiving colistin-based regimen and 83 patients receiving high-dose ampicillin/sulbactam-based regimen. The 28-day mortality rate in the ampicillin/sulbactam group (27.7%) was significantly lower than the colistin group (57.5%) (adjusted RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.71). The 14-day and 28-day clinical success rates of the ampicillin/sulbactam group (50.6% and 68.7%) were both significantly higher than those of the colistin group (23.0% and 32.2%) (aRR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.42-3.42 and aRR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.52-2.99). Also, both 14-day and 28-day kidney injury in the ampicillin/sulbactam group (0.6 ± 1.2 and 0.7 ± 1.4) were significantly lower than those in the colistin group (0.9 ± 1.2 and 1.0 ± 1.3) (aRR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.52-0.91 and aRR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.99). Conclusion In patients with CRAB nosocomial pneumonia, High-dose ampicillin/sulbactam-based combination therapy is a better treatment option because of its lower mortality, higher clinical success rate, and lower risk of kidney injury. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.100
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

310. A comparative study on the effectiveness and safety between colistin-based and high-dose ampicillin/sulbactam-based combination therapy for nosocomial pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Imchang Lee, Ki-Byung Lee, Seung Soon Lee, Jong Hwa Lee
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

310. A comparative study on the effectiveness and safety between colistin-based and high-dose ampicillin/sulbactam-based combination therapy for nosocomial pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Imchang Lee, Ki-Byung Lee, Seung Soon Lee, Jong Hwa Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background There are differences between IDSA guidance and ESCMID guideline in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). We compared differences in treatment outcomes between the colistin-based and high-dose ampicillin/sulbactam-based regimen in CRAB pneumonia. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients diagnosed with nosocomial pneumonia (clinically defined pneumonia or pneumonia with specific laboratory findings according to the CDC/NHSN surveillance definition) by CRAB (with a meropenem MIC ≥16ug/ml, colistin MIC 1 ≤ug/ml, and ampicillin/sulbactam MIC ≥4ug/ml) in a university-affiliated hospital in Korea. The study enrolled those who received colistin-based regimen using a loading dose of colistin followed by a maintenance dose (June 2021 to May 2022) and high-dose ampicillin/sulbactam-based regimen using sulbactam 9g/day (October 2022 to September 2023). The primary outcome (all-cause mortality within 28 days) and secondary outcomes (including 14-day/28-day clinical success rates and 14-day/28-day kidney injury -RIFLE score) between the two groups were compared using a Log-binomial regression. Results A total of 170 CRAB pneumonia patients were enrolled in the study, including 87 patients receiving colistin-based regimen and 83 patients receiving high-dose ampicillin/sulbactam-based regimen. The 28-day mortality rate in the ampicillin/sulbactam group (27.7%) was significantly lower than the colistin group (57.5%) (adjusted RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.71). The 14-day and 28-day clinical success rates of the ampicillin/sulbactam group (50.6% and 68.7%) were both significantly higher than those of the colistin group (23.0% and 32.2%) (aRR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.42-3.42 and aRR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.52-2.99). Also, both 14-day and 28-day kidney injury in the ampicillin/sulbactam group (0.6 ± 1.2 and 0.7 ± 1.4) were significantly lower than those in the colistin group (0.9 ± 1.2 and 1.0 ± 1.3) (aRR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.52-0.91 and aRR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.99). Conclusion In patients with CRAB nosocomial pneumonia, High-dose ampicillin/sulbactam-based combination therapy is a better treatment option because of its lower mortality, higher clinical success rate, and lower risk of kidney injury. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Hallym University (KR), Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.