P-986. Integration of the National HIV Curriculum (NHC) into health professions programs: faculty and student/trainee reflections and perspectives

Abstract Background Targeted Access Knowledge and Education on HIV for Health Professions Programs (TAKE on HIV for Health Professions Programs) is a Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) funded effort to support National HIV Curriculum (NHC) integration into health professions programs (HPPs) to cultivate HIV prevention and care knowledge into student/trainee (learners) practice and build the HIV workforce. We report on faculty and learners perspectives within integrating HPPs. Methods Using mixed methodology, faculty and learners were asked about their NHC integration experience which was facilitated by the TAKE on HIV training and technical assistance (TTA) Team. Following an integration cycle, faculty participated in 1:1 structured interviews and a focus group to identify facilitators/challenges of integration and sustainment plans. Learners completed a digital survey about time to complete NHC lessons and ratings of HIV knowledge, confidence, and usability of the NHC platform (Likert scale: 1- strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analyses, descriptive statistics and mean Likert scores. Results Nine participating faculty were from the following HPP disciplines: 3 from Pharmacy, 1 each from Physician Assistant and Family Medicine Residency, and 4 from Nursing. Integration facilitators included TTA support and guidance and NHC student tracking capability. A barrier was learner difficulty with navigating the platform and suggestion for improvement was providing additional visual learner resources for platform navigation. All faculty reported desire to sustain NHC integration with subsequent cohorts and additional NHC lessons. 46 learners completed the survey (13% response rate). 67% reported taking 15-30 minutes to complete an NHC lesson. Overall learners reported having improved HIV knowledge (mean=4.42), confidence in providing HIV care (mean=4.07), and ease of NHC platform navigation (mean=4.29). Conclusion NHC integration into HPPs is sustainable if sufficient resources are provided to faculty. TAKE on HIV effectively provides HPP faculty with free TTA resources to facilitate NHC integration and a framework for replicability. HIV knowledge gain amongst learners within integrating HPPs was demonstrated. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1176
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-986. Integration of the National HIV Curriculum (NHC) into health professions programs: faculty and student/trainee reflections and perspectives

Trisha V. Melhado, Suyen Schneegans, Eve O. Asuelime, Waridibo E. Allison et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

P-986. Integration of the National HIV Curriculum (NHC) into health professions programs: faculty and student/trainee reflections and perspectives

Trisha V. Melhado, Suyen Schneegans, Eve O. Asuelime, Waridibo E. Allison, Nathaniel Teplitskly, Alejandra Garcia-Ponce
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Targeted Access Knowledge and Education on HIV for Health Professions Programs (TAKE on HIV for Health Professions Programs) is a Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) funded effort to support National HIV Curriculum (NHC) integration into health professions programs (HPPs) to cultivate HIV prevention and care knowledge into student/trainee (learners) practice and build the HIV workforce. We report on faculty and learners perspectives within integrating HPPs. Methods Using mixed methodology, faculty and learners were asked about their NHC integration experience which was facilitated by the TAKE on HIV training and technical assistance (TTA) Team. Following an integration cycle, faculty participated in 1:1 structured interviews and a focus group to identify facilitators/challenges of integration and sustainment plans. Learners completed a digital survey about time to complete NHC lessons and ratings of HIV knowledge, confidence, and usability of the NHC platform (Likert scale: 1- strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analyses, descriptive statistics and mean Likert scores. Results Nine participating faculty were from the following HPP disciplines: 3 from Pharmacy, 1 each from Physician Assistant and Family Medicine Residency, and 4 from Nursing. Integration facilitators included TTA support and guidance and NHC student tracking capability. A barrier was learner difficulty with navigating the platform and suggestion for improvement was providing additional visual learner resources for platform navigation. All faculty reported desire to sustain NHC integration with subsequent cohorts and additional NHC lessons. 46 learners completed the survey (13% response rate). 67% reported taking 15-30 minutes to complete an NHC lesson. Overall learners reported having improved HIV knowledge (mean=4.42), confidence in providing HIV care (mean=4.07), and ease of NHC platform navigation (mean=4.29). Conclusion NHC integration into HPPs is sustainable if sufficient resources are provided to faculty. TAKE on HIV effectively provides HPP faculty with free TTA resources to facilitate NHC integration and a framework for replicability. HIV knowledge gain amongst learners within integrating HPPs was demonstrated. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
University of North Texas (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
OPEC Fund for International Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.