Is There a Simple Descriptor to Predict Laves Phases?

Laves phases AB2, which represent the largest group of intermetallic compounds, have many applications as structural and functional materials, whose properties can be optimized through the tuning of solid solutions such as (A1,A2)B2 or A(B1,B2)2. Although they are known to be governed by size and electronic factors, there is no universal set of rules that is able to predict which arbitrary combination of elements will lead to Laves structures. Models have been recently developed that can predict Laves structures accurately based on conventional machine learning algorithms, but more interpretable models would be desirable. Through application of the sure independence screening and sparsifying operator (SISSO) method, modified using decision trees as the scoring function, simple descriptors based on elemental properties were sought to classify Laves vs non-Laves structures within a data set consisting of 534 binary and 3833 ternary experimentally known intermetallic phases reported in Pearson’s Crystal Data. A model based on a one-dimensional descriptor was proposed that depends on elemental properties of the A and B components, with the electron density at the boundary of the Wigner–Seitz cell for the B component playing an important role. This model gave an accuracy of 90% in predicting Laves vs non-Laves structures among binary and ternary phases. As a test of the model, the solid solubility limits for Dy(AgxAl1–x)2 and Er(AgxAl1–x)2 Laves phases were predicted and then experimentally validated through arc-melting reactions and structural characterization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crystal Growth & Design
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.4c01680
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is There a Simple Descriptor to Predict Laves Phases?

Ritobroto Sikdar, Balaranjan Selvaratnam, Vidyanshu Mishra, Arthur Mar
3 citations
Crystal Growth & Design
Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
2.14
article

Is There a Simple Descriptor to Predict Laves Phases?

Ritobroto Sikdar, Balaranjan Selvaratnam, Vidyanshu Mishra, Arthur Mar
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Laves phases AB2, which represent the largest group of intermetallic compounds, have many applications as structural and functional materials, whose properties can be optimized through the tuning of solid solutions such as (A1,A2)B2 or A(B1,B2)2. Although they are known to be governed by size and electronic factors, there is no universal set of rules that is able to predict which arbitrary combination of elements will lead to Laves structures. Models have been recently developed that can predict Laves structures accurately based on conventional machine learning algorithms, but more interpretable models would be desirable. Through application of the sure independence screening and sparsifying operator (SISSO) method, modified using decision trees as the scoring function, simple descriptors based on elemental properties were sought to classify Laves vs non-Laves structures within a data set consisting of 534 binary and 3833 ternary experimentally known intermetallic phases reported in Pearson’s Crystal Data. A model based on a one-dimensional descriptor was proposed that depends on elemental properties of the A and B components, with the electron density at the boundary of the Wigner–Seitz cell for the B component playing an important role. This model gave an accuracy of 90% in predicting Laves vs non-Laves structures among binary and ternary phases. As a test of the model, the solid solubility limits for Dy(AgxAl1–x)2 and Er(AgxAl1–x)2 Laves phases were predicted and then experimentally validated through arc-melting reactions and structural characterization.

Crystal Growth & DesignVol. 25(3)
University of Alberta (CA)
Canada First Research Excellence Fund, Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.