Valuating the Effect of Toulmin Argumentation Model on Critical Thinking and Epistemological Beliefs in Online Education

This study investigates the effectiveness of the Toulmin argumentation model in developing critical thinking skills and epistemological beliefs concerning the internet in an online educational setting, especially during the global coronavirus pandemic. The subject of the research was carried out in the "Child Development Department" of a state university with the participation of 68 volunteer students, mostly from Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia, aged between 19 and 25. It employed quasi-experimental design in the course of the ten weeks in the 2020-2021 academic years. Data were collected through online tests and evaluations during child science and technology lessons focusing on various spatial and contemporary scientific topics. Students' critical thinking skills and epistemological beliefs were according to predetermined scales, and were analyzed using SPSS 22. Differences between the control and experimental groups were not significant for critical thinking skills or epistemological beliefs. This suggests that the implementation of the Toulmin model in an online format did not have any significant effects on these areas. Further, a very weak correlation between epistemological beliefs and critical thinking skills emerged, indicating that these constructs can work independently in online learning contexts. The results stress the complexities behind promoting critical thinking and epistemological beliefs in online learning environments, making it imperative to involve new theory in the integration of argumentation models, such as that of Toulmin's, into online education. The study seems to offer valuable theoretical guidance to the teachers and curriculum developers to effectively embed critical thinking and epistemological understanding in the digital age of education. Future research will involve longer interventions, diverse samples, and innovative strategies of teaching to affect epistemological beliefs and create opportunities for critical thinking in digital learning spaces.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Sciences
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35923/jes.2024.2.09
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Valuating the Effect of Toulmin Argumentation Model on Critical Thinking and Epistemological Beliefs in Online Education

İsmail Dönmez, Salih Gülen
2 citations
Journal of Educational Sciences
Education and Critical Thinking Development
4.19
article

Valuating the Effect of Toulmin Argumentation Model on Critical Thinking and Epistemological Beliefs in Online Education

İsmail Dönmez, Salih Gülen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of the Toulmin argumentation model in developing critical thinking skills and epistemological beliefs concerning the internet in an online educational setting, especially during the global coronavirus pandemic. The subject of the research was carried out in the "Child Development Department" of a state university with the participation of 68 volunteer students, mostly from Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia, aged between 19 and 25. It employed quasi-experimental design in the course of the ten weeks in the 2020-2021 academic years. Data were collected through online tests and evaluations during child science and technology lessons focusing on various spatial and contemporary scientific topics. Students' critical thinking skills and epistemological beliefs were according to predetermined scales, and were analyzed using SPSS 22. Differences between the control and experimental groups were not significant for critical thinking skills or epistemological beliefs. This suggests that the implementation of the Toulmin model in an online format did not have any significant effects on these areas. Further, a very weak correlation between epistemological beliefs and critical thinking skills emerged, indicating that these constructs can work independently in online learning contexts. The results stress the complexities behind promoting critical thinking and epistemological beliefs in online learning environments, making it imperative to involve new theory in the integration of argumentation models, such as that of Toulmin's, into online education. The study seems to offer valuable theoretical guidance to the teachers and curriculum developers to effectively embed critical thinking and epistemological understanding in the digital age of education. Future research will involve longer interventions, diverse samples, and innovative strategies of teaching to affect epistemological beliefs and create opportunities for critical thinking in digital learning spaces.

Journal of Educational SciencesVol. 50(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.