Forecasting Drilling Mud Losses Using Python

Introduction. Drilling mud losses are among the most common complications encountered during well drilling. Forecasting these losses is a priority as it helps minimize drilling fluid wastage and prevent wellbore incidents. Mud loss events are primarily influenced by the geological properties of the formations being drilled. Understanding the relationship between mud loss occurrences and the geological characteristics of the formations has both fundamental and practical significance. Given the complexity of predicting mud loss probabilities using traditional mathematical models, this study aims to develop a machine-learning-based system to predict the probability of mud losses based on well location and stratigraphic description. Materials and Methods . Experimental data from 735 wells at the Shkapovskoye oil field, including well location coordinates, geological layer indices, and mud loss intensities, were prepared for computational analysis. The dataset was divided into training and testing subsets. The classification problem was addressed using four intensity classes with the following machine learning models: Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Linear Discriminant Analysis. Results . Predictions generated by the three models were compared against the experimental data in the test set. The evaluation metrics included accuracy and recall. All three models achieved an average prediction accuracy of 91%. Linear Discriminant Analysis was identified as the most accurate model. Discussion and Conclusion . High-accuracy predictions enable reliable forecasting of the probability and intensity of mud losses based on the location and stratigraphic description of new wells. The study presents three machine learning methods that demonstrated superior results in solving this problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23947/2587-8999-2024-8-4-19-26
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forecasting Drilling Mud Losses Using Python

К. Ф. Коледина, N. V. Kornilaev
COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
Drilling and Well Engineering
article

Forecasting Drilling Mud Losses Using Python

К. Ф. Коледина, N. V. Kornilaev
article en

Abstract

Introduction. Drilling mud losses are among the most common complications encountered during well drilling. Forecasting these losses is a priority as it helps minimize drilling fluid wastage and prevent wellbore incidents. Mud loss events are primarily influenced by the geological properties of the formations being drilled. Understanding the relationship between mud loss occurrences and the geological characteristics of the formations has both fundamental and practical significance. Given the complexity of predicting mud loss probabilities using traditional mathematical models, this study aims to develop a machine-learning-based system to predict the probability of mud losses based on well location and stratigraphic description. Materials and Methods . Experimental data from 735 wells at the Shkapovskoye oil field, including well location coordinates, geological layer indices, and mud loss intensities, were prepared for computational analysis. The dataset was divided into training and testing subsets. The classification problem was addressed using four intensity classes with the following machine learning models: Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Linear Discriminant Analysis. Results . Predictions generated by the three models were compared against the experimental data in the test set. The evaluation metrics included accuracy and recall. All three models achieved an average prediction accuracy of 91%. Linear Discriminant Analysis was identified as the most accurate model. Discussion and Conclusion . High-accuracy predictions enable reliable forecasting of the probability and intensity of mud losses based on the location and stratigraphic description of new wells. The study presents three machine learning methods that demonstrated superior results in solving this problem.

COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIESVol. 8(4)
Ufa State Petroleum Technological University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Drilling and Well Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Forecasting Drilling Mud Losses Using Python — К. Ф. Коледина, N. V. Kornilaev · COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS