Government Intervention Strategy in Poverty Reduction: Study on the District and City in Indonesia Across 2016-2023

Poverty remains a significant challenge in Indonesia, with a national rate of around 9.36% in 2023 and 16 provinces exceeding this poverty level. This study aims to analyze poverty patterns across districts and cities by using K-Means Clustering and examine the effectiveness of government interventions in poverty reduction through panel data regression with the Fixed Effect Model (FEM). Results indicate that higher-poverty areas benefit most from social assistance, village funds, credit schemes, and GRDP, while capital spending exacerbates poverty. On the other hand, lower-poverty areas achieve reductions through capital spending, village funds, and GRDP, with minimal impact from social assistance and credit schemes. Also, these results emphasize the need for targeted interventions, such as optimizing social assistance and credit access programs in higher-poverty areas and implementing growth-focused strategies, including physical infrastructure development, in lower-poverty regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Bina Praja
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.489-508
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Government Intervention Strategy in Poverty Reduction: Study on the District and City in Indonesia Across 2016-2023

Mohammad Ahlis Djirimu, Aln Pujo Priambodo
Jurnal Bina Praja
Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies
article

Government Intervention Strategy in Poverty Reduction: Study on the District and City in Indonesia Across 2016-2023

Mohammad Ahlis Djirimu, Aln Pujo Priambodo
article en

Abstract

Poverty remains a significant challenge in Indonesia, with a national rate of around 9.36% in 2023 and 16 provinces exceeding this poverty level. This study aims to analyze poverty patterns across districts and cities by using K-Means Clustering and examine the effectiveness of government interventions in poverty reduction through panel data regression with the Fixed Effect Model (FEM). Results indicate that higher-poverty areas benefit most from social assistance, village funds, credit schemes, and GRDP, while capital spending exacerbates poverty. On the other hand, lower-poverty areas achieve reductions through capital spending, village funds, and GRDP, with minimal impact from social assistance and credit schemes. Also, these results emphasize the need for targeted interventions, such as optimizing social assistance and credit access programs in higher-poverty areas and implementing growth-focused strategies, including physical infrastructure development, in lower-poverty regions.

Jurnal Bina PrajaVol. 16(3)
United States Department of the Treasury (US), Tadulako University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Government Intervention Strategy in Poverty Reduction: Study on the District and City in Indonesia Across 2016-2023 — Mohammad Ahlis Djirimu, Aln Pujo Priambodo · Jurnal Bina Praja (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS