Equity in medical devices: a socio-technical approach

Medical devices risk reinforcing societal inequalities unless we rethink how they are designed, developed and deployed. The UK government’s recent independent review on Equity in Medical Devices highlights how biases in the design and use of medical devices can lead to solutions that fail to equitably distribute benefits or can further exacerbate health inequalities. In this paper, we draw attention to how wider social, cultural, political and economic factors can also shape the way medical devices are designed, developed and deployed, and how individuals can access or come to be excluded from the associated benefits. Using the example of continuous glucose monitoring devices, we show the potential for medical devices to undermine patient well-being, to occlude patient expertise, and to reflect the priorities of politics rather than patients. These systemic failures highlight the urgent need to reconsider innovation and to develop processes where equity is a fundamental goal and moral responsibility. Here, we suggest a framework for equitable innovation that combines a process of co-design that accounts for knowledge, power and social differences among stakeholders, with considerations of technical needs alongside the institutional arrangements that mediate how devices are deployed in different social contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Innovations
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2024-001306
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equity in medical devices: a socio-technical approach

Robert A. Farnan, Jonathan Ensor, Steven L. Johnson
BMJ Innovations
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

Equity in medical devices: a socio-technical approach

Robert A. Farnan, Jonathan Ensor, Steven L. Johnson
article en

Abstract

Medical devices risk reinforcing societal inequalities unless we rethink how they are designed, developed and deployed. The UK government’s recent independent review on Equity in Medical Devices highlights how biases in the design and use of medical devices can lead to solutions that fail to equitably distribute benefits or can further exacerbate health inequalities. In this paper, we draw attention to how wider social, cultural, political and economic factors can also shape the way medical devices are designed, developed and deployed, and how individuals can access or come to be excluded from the associated benefits. Using the example of continuous glucose monitoring devices, we show the potential for medical devices to undermine patient well-being, to occlude patient expertise, and to reflect the priorities of politics rather than patients. These systemic failures highlight the urgent need to reconsider innovation and to develop processes where equity is a fundamental goal and moral responsibility. Here, we suggest a framework for equitable innovation that combines a process of co-design that accounts for knowledge, power and social differences among stakeholders, with considerations of technical needs alongside the institutional arrangements that mediate how devices are deployed in different social contexts.

BMJ InnovationsVol. 10(4)
University of York (GB)
University of York, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Equity in medical devices: a socio-technical approach — Robert A. Farnan, Jonathan Ensor, et al. · BMJ Innovations (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS