Subspace Rotation Algorithm for Training Restricted Hopfield Network

This paper introduces the Subspace Rotation Algorithm (SRA) for training the Restricted Hopfield Network (RHN) as an auto-associative memory. SRA is a gradient-free subspace tracking method based on Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to update the weight matrix. Despite having slightly worse time complexity than Back-propagation (BP) theoretically, in practice, SRA completes training faster since it requires fewer iterations to converge. Comparative analysis with BP for training RHN reveals that SRA consistently reaches the optimal solution, whereas BP fails to achieve comparable performance if the weight initialization is not within the appropriate basin of attraction. Experiments involving the memorization of 10, 50, and 100 patterns from the MNIST dataset show that RHN trained with SRA exhibits better robustness to noisy and corrupted patterns compared to RHN trained with BP. These findings suggest that SRA offers a more reliable and effective method for training RHNs in applications needing high tolerance to input distortions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictai62512.2024.00110
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subspace Rotation Algorithm for Training Restricted Hopfield Network

Iluju Kiringa, Tet Yeap, Ci Lin
1 citations
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
0.21
article

Subspace Rotation Algorithm for Training Restricted Hopfield Network

Iluju Kiringa, Tet Yeap, Ci Lin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper introduces the Subspace Rotation Algorithm (SRA) for training the Restricted Hopfield Network (RHN) as an auto-associative memory. SRA is a gradient-free subspace tracking method based on Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to update the weight matrix. Despite having slightly worse time complexity than Back-propagation (BP) theoretically, in practice, SRA completes training faster since it requires fewer iterations to converge. Comparative analysis with BP for training RHN reveals that SRA consistently reaches the optimal solution, whereas BP fails to achieve comparable performance if the weight initialization is not within the appropriate basin of attraction. Experiments involving the memorization of 10, 50, and 100 patterns from the MNIST dataset show that RHN trained with SRA exhibits better robustness to noisy and corrupted patterns compared to RHN trained with BP. These findings suggest that SRA offers a more reliable and effective method for training RHNs in applications needing high tolerance to input distortions.

University of Ottawa (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Subspace Rotation Algorithm for Training Restricted Hopfield Network — Iluju Kiringa, Tet Yeap, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS