LPNA: A 2.75 ms Low-Latency and 0.40 uJ/point Energy-Efficient LiDAR Point-Cloud Neural Network Accelerator with Cylindrical Bin Partitioning

As the interest in 3D perception for outdoor applications grows, 3D Point-cloud Neural Network (PNN) with LiDAR has been actively developed [1]. Due to the unstructured and unordered properties of point-cloud, prior PNNs applied additional preprocessing, e.g., voxelization, 3D projection, even though such methods lose point data. To achieve high performance in 3D segmentation, recent PNNs directly use point-cloud data as input and learn accurate point-wise features [2]. However, such a network requires a serial process of special functions, e.g., k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) search and shared multi-layer perception (MLP), due to the properties of point-cloud. The serial process of kNN search and shared MLP causes long processing latency. Also, a large amount of external memory access (EMA) is inevitable in decoder layers for interpolation. Thus, PNN solely takes $\sim 335 \mathrm{~ms}$ on a high-end CPU+ GPU system (Fig.1).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/a-sscc60305.2024.10849179
Primary Topic
Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LPNA: A 2.75 ms Low-Latency and 0.40 uJ/point Energy-Efficient LiDAR Point-Cloud Neural Network Accelerator with Cylindrical Bin Partitioning

Donghyeon Han, Jueun Jung, Bokyoung Seo, Kyuho Lee
Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
article

LPNA: A 2.75 ms Low-Latency and 0.40 uJ/point Energy-Efficient LiDAR Point-Cloud Neural Network Accelerator with Cylindrical Bin Partitioning

Donghyeon Han, Jueun Jung, Bokyoung Seo, Kyuho Lee
article en

Abstract

As the interest in 3D perception for outdoor applications grows, 3D Point-cloud Neural Network (PNN) with LiDAR has been actively developed [1]. Due to the unstructured and unordered properties of point-cloud, prior PNNs applied additional preprocessing, e.g., voxelization, 3D projection, even though such methods lose point data. To achieve high performance in 3D segmentation, recent PNNs directly use point-cloud data as input and learn accurate point-wise features [2]. However, such a network requires a serial process of special functions, e.g., k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) search and shared multi-layer perception (MLP), due to the properties of point-cloud. The serial process of kNN search and shared MLP causes long processing latency. Also, a large amount of external memory access (EMA) is inevitable in decoder layers for interpolation. Thus, PNN solely takes $\sim 335 \mathrm{~ms}$ on a high-end CPU+ GPU system (Fig.1).

IIT@MIT (US), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea, IC Design Education Center
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.