Explainability in Machine Learning & AI Models for Complex Data Structures on Scorecards Development in Retail Banking

As machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) models continue to revolutionize retail banking, their application in tasks such as predicting customer behaviour, assessing credit risk, and detecting fraudulent activities has become increasingly complex. While these advanced models offer significant predictive power, they often operate as “black boxes,” making their decision-making processes opaque and challenging to interpret. This lack of transparency poses critical issues in retail banking, where trust and clarity are paramount. Through a comprehensive review of the literature on machine learning explainability techniques, this work found that traditional scorecards, which rely on straightforward models like logistic regression, have been surpassed by sophisticated AI systems capable of handling high-dimensional, heterogeneous, and temporally interdependent data. However, these systems' complexity undermines stakeholder confidence and understanding. Current explainability approaches, including model-agnostic techniques such as SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations), as well as model-specific techniques such as decision trees and Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP), provide valuable insights but fall short in managing the intricate data structures and interactions characteristic of retail banking. These methods are often limited by their computational demands, instability, and difficulty scaling to more complex models. Therefore, to address these gaps, this study recommends and proposes the development of hybrid models that blend interpretable components with complex AI systems, interactive visualization tools that facilitate dynamic exploration and understanding of model predictions, and the application of natural language processing for automated, accessible explanation generation. By enhancing the explainability of AI models, these approaches aim to improve transparency, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder trust in retail banking, thus paving the way for more accountable and understandable AI-driven decision-making processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/imitec60221.2024.10851055
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainability in Machine Learning & AI Models for Complex Data Structures on Scorecards Development in Retail Banking

William Tichaona Vambe, Eddwin Cheteni
1 citations
Big Data and Business Intelligence
0.53
article

Explainability in Machine Learning & AI Models for Complex Data Structures on Scorecards Development in Retail Banking

William Tichaona Vambe, Eddwin Cheteni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) models continue to revolutionize retail banking, their application in tasks such as predicting customer behaviour, assessing credit risk, and detecting fraudulent activities has become increasingly complex. While these advanced models offer significant predictive power, they often operate as “black boxes,” making their decision-making processes opaque and challenging to interpret. This lack of transparency poses critical issues in retail banking, where trust and clarity are paramount. Through a comprehensive review of the literature on machine learning explainability techniques, this work found that traditional scorecards, which rely on straightforward models like logistic regression, have been surpassed by sophisticated AI systems capable of handling high-dimensional, heterogeneous, and temporally interdependent data. However, these systems' complexity undermines stakeholder confidence and understanding. Current explainability approaches, including model-agnostic techniques such as SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations), as well as model-specific techniques such as decision trees and Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP), provide valuable insights but fall short in managing the intricate data structures and interactions characteristic of retail banking. These methods are often limited by their computational demands, instability, and difficulty scaling to more complex models. Therefore, to address these gaps, this study recommends and proposes the development of hybrid models that blend interpretable components with complex AI systems, interactive visualization tools that facilitate dynamic exploration and understanding of model predictions, and the application of natural language processing for automated, accessible explanation generation. By enhancing the explainability of AI models, these approaches aim to improve transparency, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder trust in retail banking, thus paving the way for more accountable and understandable AI-driven decision-making processes.

University of Pretoria (ZA), Walter Sisulu University (ZA)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.