A Legal Multi-Choice Question Answering Model Based on DeBERTa and Attention Mechanism

This paper presents a novel multi-choice question answering model tailored for the legal domain, which integrates a DeBERTa-based framework with bilinear attention mechanisms. The model is designed to enhance the interpretation of complex legal texts, utilising vector similarity searches to align questions with pertinent statutes and a neural network to analyse this data effectively. It aims to improve the accuracy of legal question answering by employing advanced techniques of natural language processing. A binary classifier is also incorporated to assess answer options and generate conclusive responses. Experimental results demonstrate the model's superiority over traditional methods, particularly in handling intricate legal questions. This study underscores the model's potential to advance legal AI technology significantly, offering substantial benefits for judicial examinations and legal professionals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictai62512.2024.00119
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Legal Multi-Choice Question Answering Model Based on DeBERTa and Attention Mechanism

Ying Luo, Xudong Luo, Guibin Chen
1 citations
Artificial Intelligence in Law
2.23
article

A Legal Multi-Choice Question Answering Model Based on DeBERTa and Attention Mechanism

Ying Luo, Xudong Luo, Guibin Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a novel multi-choice question answering model tailored for the legal domain, which integrates a DeBERTa-based framework with bilinear attention mechanisms. The model is designed to enhance the interpretation of complex legal texts, utilising vector similarity searches to align questions with pertinent statutes and a neural network to analyse this data effectively. It aims to improve the accuracy of legal question answering by employing advanced techniques of natural language processing. A binary classifier is also incorporated to assess answer options and generate conclusive responses. Experimental results demonstrate the model's superiority over traditional methods, particularly in handling intricate legal questions. This study underscores the model's potential to advance legal AI technology significantly, offering substantial benefits for judicial examinations and legal professionals.

Guangxi Normal University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.