Detecting Environment Drift in Reinforcement Learning Using a Gaussian Process

This study introduces a novel two-stage method, GPAction, for detecting environment drift in reinforcement learning settings. We first train a Gaussian process predicting the reinforcement learning agents' actions and then detect environment drifts by monitoring the mean squared error between the predicted actions of a Gaussian process action predictor and actual actions. Our proposed method is evaluated against three baselines across four environments with continuous action spaces. Results demonstrate the superior performance of GPAction in detecting environment drift. In an ablation study, by analyzing the plots and AUC values of the MSEs, we show that our method GPAction can provide more distinguishable monitoring metrics than the Gaussian process state predictor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictai62512.2024.00142
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Environment Drift in Reinforcement Learning Using a Gaussian Process

Uwe Zdun, Zhizhou Fang
1 citations
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
0.36
article

Detecting Environment Drift in Reinforcement Learning Using a Gaussian Process

Uwe Zdun, Zhizhou Fang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study introduces a novel two-stage method, GPAction, for detecting environment drift in reinforcement learning settings. We first train a Gaussian process predicting the reinforcement learning agents' actions and then detect environment drifts by monitoring the mean squared error between the predicted actions of a Gaussian process action predictor and actual actions. Our proposed method is evaluated against three baselines across four environments with continuous action spaces. Results demonstrate the superior performance of GPAction in detecting environment drift. In an ablation study, by analyzing the plots and AUC values of the MSEs, we show that our method GPAction can provide more distinguishable monitoring metrics than the Gaussian process state predictor.

University of Vienna (AT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.