IndiCon: Selecting SAT Encodings for Individual Pseudo-Boolean and Linear Integer Constraints

Encoding to SAT and applying a state-of-the-art SAT solver can be a highly effective way of solving constraint problems. For many types of constraints there exist several alternative SAT encodings; and the choice of encoding can significantly affect SAT solver performance for any given problem. Previous work has shown that machine learning (ML) can be used to select SAT encodings for some constraint types, making a choice for each relevant constraint type in a problem instance. The state-of-the-art approach achieves good performance by first building a small portfolio of configurations, then selecting a configuration for a given problem instance using an ML model. The approach necessitates generating training data for every combination of encodings for the constraint types, thus it scales exponentially as more constraint types are added. In this work, we select potentially different encodings for each individual constraint in a problem instance. We are able to match the state-of-the-art performance while avoiding any limitation on the number of constraint types considered. To achieve this we are proposing new individual constraint features, we present a novel method for generating training data, and we have developed a new machine learning pipeline involving both unsupervised and supervised learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictai62512.2024.00014
Primary Topic
Formal Methods in Verification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IndiCon: Selecting SAT Encodings for Individual Pseudo-Boolean and Linear Integer Constraints

Felix Ulrich-Oltean, James Alfred Walker, Peter Nightingale
Formal Methods in Verification
article

IndiCon: Selecting SAT Encodings for Individual Pseudo-Boolean and Linear Integer Constraints

Felix Ulrich-Oltean, James Alfred Walker, Peter Nightingale
article en

Abstract

Encoding to SAT and applying a state-of-the-art SAT solver can be a highly effective way of solving constraint problems. For many types of constraints there exist several alternative SAT encodings; and the choice of encoding can significantly affect SAT solver performance for any given problem. Previous work has shown that machine learning (ML) can be used to select SAT encodings for some constraint types, making a choice for each relevant constraint type in a problem instance. The state-of-the-art approach achieves good performance by first building a small portfolio of configurations, then selecting a configuration for a given problem instance using an ML model. The approach necessitates generating training data for every combination of encodings for the constraint types, thus it scales exponentially as more constraint types are added. In this work, we select potentially different encodings for each individual constraint in a problem instance. We are able to match the state-of-the-art performance while avoiding any limitation on the number of constraint types considered. To achieve this we are proposing new individual constraint features, we present a novel method for generating training data, and we have developed a new machine learning pipeline involving both unsupervised and supervised learning.

University of York (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Formal Methods in Verification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

IndiCon: Selecting SAT Encodings for Individual Pseudo-Boolean and Linear Integer Constraints — Felix Ulrich-Oltean, James Alfred Walker, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS