A Comprehensive and Comparative Investigation of Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms for Photovoltaic Systems
This paper presents a detailed comparative analysis of conventional and AI-driven Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques utilized in photovoltaic (PV) systems. The study evaluates Fuzzy Logic Control (FLC) methods, the incremental conductance (INC) method, Perturb and Observe (P&O) methods with both fixed and variable step sizes, and the Simplified Model-Based State Estimation (SMSE-based) method. All simulations were rigorously conducted in the MATLAB/SIMULINK for ensuring consistent application of each technique, enabling a comprehensive comparison of their performance across various solar irradiance conditions. Results show that despite initial high oscillations, the SMSE-based method efficiently reaches the Maximum Power Point (MPP) with efficiency values of up to 99.9%. Fuzzy Logic Control Set-2 demonstrates exceptional performance with minimal oscillations and high efficiency, making it a robust choice for dynamic conditions. The Incremental Conductance method and Fuzzy Logic Control Set-1 exhibit moderate oscillations and longer times to reach the MPP, with efficiencies up to 99.7% and 99.6%, respectively. The P&O Variable Step method outperforms the Fixed Step method in both convergence speed and minimizing oscillations. This paper contributes to the evolution of MPPT techniques by highlighting the trade-offs between convergence speed, efficiency, and stability, offering valuable insights for optimizing PV system performance.
Authors
- Husam A. Ramadan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7865-2207)
- Hamdy A. Ziedan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5904-1523)
- Ahmed A. Zaki Diab (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8598-9983)
- Abdalla I. Elrefaei
Institutions
- Suez University (EG)
- Minia University (EG)
- Assiut University (EG)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-12-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/mepcon63025.2024.10850275
- Primary Topic
- Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00