Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Approaches for Fault Classification in Distribution Networks

This research presents how to evaluate the performance of the Machine Learning Classifiers (MLC) as an intelligent fault diagnosis (IFD) for fault classification in distribution networks under different operation condition whether these cases are normal or fault cases. IEEE 16-bus system was studied as a case of distribution systems. The approach utilizes the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) for transient current signal processing, using the MATLAB Wavelet Toolbox, specifically applying the maximum (D8) from the Sym3 wavelet at the 8<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sup> level as input for (MLC). The study evaluates nine classification algorithms including Decision Tree, Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression, Efficient Linear SVM, Naïve Bayes, SVM, K-Nearest Neighbors Classifiers (KNN), Ensemble methods, Neural Network and Kernel through 34 different classifiers to assess their performance based on accuracy, prediction speed, and training time for phases A, B, C, and G. The results show that both Gaussian Naïve Bayes and Kernel Naïve Bayes achieved perfect validation accuracy (100%) in detecting faults in the distribution network for all phases. However, Gaussian Naïve Bayes outperformed Kernel Naïve Bayes in terms of prediction speed and training time, making it the most suitable classifier for this application. The classifiers effectively distinguished different fault types, including Line-to-Ground Fault (L-GF), Line-to-Line Fault (LL-F), Line-to-Line-to-Ground Fault (LL-GF), Three-Phase Fault (3L-F) with nearly 100% validation accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mepcon63025.2024.10850432
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electricity Theft Detection Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Approaches for Fault Classification in Distribution Networks

Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz, Basem Abd-Elhamed Rashad, Eman S. Ahmed, Esraa M. Shalby
2 citations
Electricity Theft Detection Techniques
0.42
article

Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Approaches for Fault Classification in Distribution Networks

Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz, Basem Abd-Elhamed Rashad, Eman S. Ahmed, Esraa M. Shalby
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This research presents how to evaluate the performance of the Machine Learning Classifiers (MLC) as an intelligent fault diagnosis (IFD) for fault classification in distribution networks under different operation condition whether these cases are normal or fault cases. IEEE 16-bus system was studied as a case of distribution systems. The approach utilizes the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) for transient current signal processing, using the MATLAB Wavelet Toolbox, specifically applying the maximum (D8) from the Sym3 wavelet at the 8<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sup> level as input for (MLC). The study evaluates nine classification algorithms including Decision Tree, Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression, Efficient Linear SVM, Naïve Bayes, SVM, K-Nearest Neighbors Classifiers (KNN), Ensemble methods, Neural Network and Kernel through 34 different classifiers to assess their performance based on accuracy, prediction speed, and training time for phases A, B, C, and G. The results show that both Gaussian Naïve Bayes and Kernel Naïve Bayes achieved perfect validation accuracy (100%) in detecting faults in the distribution network for all phases. However, Gaussian Naïve Bayes outperformed Kernel Naïve Bayes in terms of prediction speed and training time, making it the most suitable classifier for this application. The classifiers effectively distinguished different fault types, including Line-to-Ground Fault (L-GF), Line-to-Line Fault (LL-F), Line-to-Line-to-Ground Fault (LL-GF), Three-Phase Fault (3L-F) with nearly 100% validation accuracy.

Ain Shams University (EG), Kafrelsheikh University (EG), El Shorouk Academy (EG), Higher Institute of Engineering (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Electricity Theft Detection Techniques
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Approaches for Fault Classification in Distribution Networks — Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz, Basem Abd-Elhamed Rashad, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS