Measuring Critical Thinking Using Challenge-Based Learning in the COVID-19 Era to Evaluate the Complexity-Reasoning Competence

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the students attended classes in different formats, hybrid, and face-to-face, according to the pandemic evolution. The objective of this research is to assess the competence of Complexity-Reasoning through Critical Thinking (SEG0502A), sub-competence by TEC21 in a basic level of performance for engineering students, with a survey using the Watson-Glaser instrument to measure the competence in the process of solving an engineering challenge in the Mechatronics Laboratory. The challenge consisted in the development of a Cyber-Physical System to monitor the status of manufacturing machinery during Fall 2021 (19 students) and Spring 2022 (24 students) in hybrid and face-to-face formats, respectively. The results indicate that the accomplishment of the Critical Thinking sub-competence showed a success percentage of 52.63% for Fall 2021 and 41.67% for Spring 2022. To improve reliable results, inference questions must ensure unique and differentiated answers from the Watson-Glaser instrument survey.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iceta63795.2024.10850814
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Critical Thinking Using Challenge-Based Learning in the COVID-19 Era to Evaluate the Complexity-Reasoning Competence

David Antonio‐Torres, Emmanuel Torres-Rios, Froylán Cortés-Santacruz, Luis Antonio Carrillo-Martinez et al.
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Measuring Critical Thinking Using Challenge-Based Learning in the COVID-19 Era to Evaluate the Complexity-Reasoning Competence

David Antonio‐Torres, Emmanuel Torres-Rios, Froylán Cortés-Santacruz, Luis Antonio Carrillo-Martinez, Daniel Pérez-Rojas, Jesús Anselmo Fortoul-Diaz, Juan Daniel Marin-Segura
article en

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the students attended classes in different formats, hybrid, and face-to-face, according to the pandemic evolution. The objective of this research is to assess the competence of Complexity-Reasoning through Critical Thinking (SEG0502A), sub-competence by TEC21 in a basic level of performance for engineering students, with a survey using the Watson-Glaser instrument to measure the competence in the process of solving an engineering challenge in the Mechatronics Laboratory. The challenge consisted in the development of a Cyber-Physical System to monitor the status of manufacturing machinery during Fall 2021 (19 students) and Spring 2022 (24 students) in hybrid and face-to-face formats, respectively. The results indicate that the accomplishment of the Critical Thinking sub-competence showed a success percentage of 52.63% for Fall 2021 and 41.67% for Spring 2022. To improve reliable results, inference questions must ensure unique and differentiated answers from the Watson-Glaser instrument survey.

Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Measuring Critical Thinking Using Challenge-Based Learning in the COVID-19 Era to Evaluate the Complexity-Reasoning Competence — David Antonio‐Torres, Emmanuel Torres-Rios, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS