A Comparative Analysis of Convolutional Neural Networks, Bi-Directional Gated Recurrent Units, and Bi-Directional Long Short-Term Memory for Sequential Data Processing Using Human Emotions Dataset

Emotion classification is an important field that can help healthcare professionals or researchers in their day-to-day activities when dealing with the emotional diagnoses of people. Not having an accurate classification might hinder the correct diagnosis of what a person is feeling, which also affects the work of healthcare professionals or researchers. Therefore, this study performed a comprehensive comparative analysis of three leading deep learning architectures: Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to know their effectiveness in sequential data processing using human emotion dataset guided by the CRoss Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) methodology. The models were evaluated using the accuracy, computational efficiency, and generalization ability matrix. Our results gave valuable insights into the optimal selection of neural network models for sequential data analysis, for emotion recognition. The GRU model had the highest accuracy of 92.90%, followed by the LSTM model with 92.70<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">%</sup>, and lastly, the CNN with 91.95%. This analysis aims to guide researchers and practitioners in the effective application of DL techniques to improve the accuracy and reliability of emotion-based systems based on sequential data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/imitec60221.2024.10851188
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Face and Expression Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Convolutional Neural Networks, Bi-Directional Gated Recurrent Units, and Bi-Directional Long Short-Term Memory for Sequential Data Processing Using Human Emotions Dataset

William Tichaona Vambe, Tinashe Crispen Garidzira
3 citations
Face and Expression Recognition
0.75
article

A Comparative Analysis of Convolutional Neural Networks, Bi-Directional Gated Recurrent Units, and Bi-Directional Long Short-Term Memory for Sequential Data Processing Using Human Emotions Dataset

William Tichaona Vambe, Tinashe Crispen Garidzira
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Emotion classification is an important field that can help healthcare professionals or researchers in their day-to-day activities when dealing with the emotional diagnoses of people. Not having an accurate classification might hinder the correct diagnosis of what a person is feeling, which also affects the work of healthcare professionals or researchers. Therefore, this study performed a comprehensive comparative analysis of three leading deep learning architectures: Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to know their effectiveness in sequential data processing using human emotion dataset guided by the CRoss Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) methodology. The models were evaluated using the accuracy, computational efficiency, and generalization ability matrix. Our results gave valuable insights into the optimal selection of neural network models for sequential data analysis, for emotion recognition. The GRU model had the highest accuracy of 92.90%, followed by the LSTM model with 92.70<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">%</sup>, and lastly, the CNN with 91.95%. This analysis aims to guide researchers and practitioners in the effective application of DL techniques to improve the accuracy and reliability of emotion-based systems based on sequential data.

Research ICT Africa (ZA), Walter Sisulu University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Face and Expression Recognition
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.