Adaptive Composite Accuracy Scoring for Domainspecific LLM Evaluation

With the increasing demand for Large Language Models (LLM) deployment across different industries, the need to evaluate LLMs with benchmarking datasets prior to deployment becomes apparent. Accuracy scores are computed individually after testing the LLMs with multiple benchmarking datasets. The popular publicly available general benchmarking datasets, such as the Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) dataset, cover multitude of domains, which are less suitable for domain-specific LLM use cases. This paper combines the goodness of objective-based evaluation (using benchmarking datasets) and subjective-based evaluation (using LLM-as-a-judge) and devises an adaptive weightage-based method to compute a domain-specific Weighted Composite Accuracy Score (WCAS) extracted from the existing benchmarking datasets without the need to rerun the entire benchmarking datasets. With a more refined domain-specific Weighted Composite Accuracy Score (WCAS), the result shows that the methodology has effectively eliminated 47 MMLU datasets with zero relevancy to the specific domain and achieved accuracy refinement of up to 12.4% and time savings of up to 87.2% compared with running 57 MMLU benchmarking datasets. This approach accelerates the decision-making process in selecting the most suitable LLM for domain-specific deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/fllm63129.2024.10852484
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptive Composite Accuracy Scoring for Domainspecific LLM Evaluation

Shin Wei Lim, Eugene J. Koay, Mee Sim Lai, Jiashen Teh et al.
1 citations
Natural Language Processing Techniques
0.35
article

Adaptive Composite Accuracy Scoring for Domainspecific LLM Evaluation

Shin Wei Lim, Eugene J. Koay, Mee Sim Lai, Jiashen Teh, Kuan Heng Lee, Myeong Soo Lee, Yuan Kuok Nee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With the increasing demand for Large Language Models (LLM) deployment across different industries, the need to evaluate LLMs with benchmarking datasets prior to deployment becomes apparent. Accuracy scores are computed individually after testing the LLMs with multiple benchmarking datasets. The popular publicly available general benchmarking datasets, such as the Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) dataset, cover multitude of domains, which are less suitable for domain-specific LLM use cases. This paper combines the goodness of objective-based evaluation (using benchmarking datasets) and subjective-based evaluation (using LLM-as-a-judge) and devises an adaptive weightage-based method to compute a domain-specific Weighted Composite Accuracy Score (WCAS) extracted from the existing benchmarking datasets without the need to rerun the entire benchmarking datasets. With a more refined domain-specific Weighted Composite Accuracy Score (WCAS), the result shows that the methodology has effectively eliminated 47 MMLU datasets with zero relevancy to the specific domain and achieved accuracy refinement of up to 12.4% and time savings of up to 87.2% compared with running 57 MMLU benchmarking datasets. This approach accelerates the decision-making process in selecting the most suitable LLM for domain-specific deployment.

Intel (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.