How to Optimally Configure Stopping Criteria for Distributed Consensus Algorithms to Estimate Network Size

Knowing at least an accurate estimate of the network size is necessary for many real-world applications (e.g., routing, synchronization, etc.). However, estimating the network size in a distributed way is not a trivial task since no centralization and global identifiers are exploited. This paper investigates how to optimally stop distributed consensus algorithms for network size estimation. More specifically, we examine three well-known algorithms from this category (namely, the Local Degree weights, the Best Constant Degree weights, and the Convex Optimized weights) in two scenarios and under several various conditions by applying two metrics. The goal of this paper is to identify which scenario ensures higher performance of distributed consensus algorithms for network size estimation. In other words, we investigate whether stopping the algorithms based on network size estimates or on arithmetic mean estimates can guarantee the lowest estimation error and the highest convergence rate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iceta63795.2024.10850811
Primary Topic
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Optimally Configure Stopping Criteria for Distributed Consensus Algorithms to Estimate Network Size

Jozef Kenyeres, Martin Kenyeres
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
article

How to Optimally Configure Stopping Criteria for Distributed Consensus Algorithms to Estimate Network Size

Jozef Kenyeres, Martin Kenyeres
article en

Abstract

Knowing at least an accurate estimate of the network size is necessary for many real-world applications (e.g., routing, synchronization, etc.). However, estimating the network size in a distributed way is not a trivial task since no centralization and global identifiers are exploited. This paper investigates how to optimally stop distributed consensus algorithms for network size estimation. More specifically, we examine three well-known algorithms from this category (namely, the Local Degree weights, the Best Constant Degree weights, and the Convex Optimized weights) in two scenarios and under several various conditions by applying two metrics. The goal of this paper is to identify which scenario ensures higher performance of distributed consensus algorithms for network size estimation. In other words, we investigate whether stopping the algorithms based on network size estimates or on arithmetic mean estimates can guarantee the lowest estimation error and the highest convergence rate.

Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Institute of Informatics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Frequentis (Austria) (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How to Optimally Configure Stopping Criteria for Distributed Consensus Algorithms to Estimate Network Size — Jozef Kenyeres, Martin Kenyeres · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS