Интересность текста: подходы к изучению и методы оценки в психолого-педагогических исследованиях

Introduction. Text interestingness is often considered a standalone motivational factor in education, making it a popular subject in psychological and educational research. The purpose of this review is to structure the information on the methodology for assessing text interestingness, identify the limitations, and highlight the intersections of various methods. Theoretical justification. Existing studies on text interestingness mainly stem from the linguistic approach, appraisal theory of interest, and individual interest theory. Using grounded theory as a method of literature analysis allowed us to identify three approaches to interestingness in research: (1) interestingness based on text characteristics, (2) interestingness based on reader characteristics, and (3) interestingness as a perceived characteristic of the text by the reader. Analysis of assessment methods revealed that each approach prioritizes its specific methods. The text-based approach describes the most objective linguistic (formal and discourse-content) assessments. In the reader-based approach, knowledge tests and self-reported assessments of individual and subject-specific interests are common. The approach to interestingness as a perceived characteristic of the text mainly utilizes subjective scaling and rating methods. Discussion. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages, and although their methods differ, they are sometimes interconnected. There is an increasing number of constructs related to interestingness. It is not so much the variety of methods, but the proliferation of synonymous constructs that may hinder the integration of research results on text interestingness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Российский психологический журнал
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2024.3.11
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Интересность текста: подходы к изучению и методы оценки в психолого-педагогических исследованиях

Юлия А. Тюменева, Екатерина С. Кащенко, Мария Ю. Лебедева
Российский психологический журнал
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
article

Интересность текста: подходы к изучению и методы оценки в психолого-педагогических исследованиях

Юлия А. Тюменева, Екатерина С. Кащенко, Мария Ю. Лебедева
article en

Abstract

Introduction. Text interestingness is often considered a standalone motivational factor in education, making it a popular subject in psychological and educational research. The purpose of this review is to structure the information on the methodology for assessing text interestingness, identify the limitations, and highlight the intersections of various methods. Theoretical justification. Existing studies on text interestingness mainly stem from the linguistic approach, appraisal theory of interest, and individual interest theory. Using grounded theory as a method of literature analysis allowed us to identify three approaches to interestingness in research: (1) interestingness based on text characteristics, (2) interestingness based on reader characteristics, and (3) interestingness as a perceived characteristic of the text by the reader. Analysis of assessment methods revealed that each approach prioritizes its specific methods. The text-based approach describes the most objective linguistic (formal and discourse-content) assessments. In the reader-based approach, knowledge tests and self-reported assessments of individual and subject-specific interests are common. The approach to interestingness as a perceived characteristic of the text mainly utilizes subjective scaling and rating methods. Discussion. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages, and although their methods differ, they are sometimes interconnected. There is an increasing number of constructs related to interestingness. It is not so much the variety of methods, but the proliferation of synonymous constructs that may hinder the integration of research results on text interestingness.

Российский психологический журналVol. 21(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.