Vehicle Collision Load Design Demands for Deck Overhangs with Parapet Railings

The majority of bridge rails used in the U.S.A. and Canada are solid concrete parapets. However, the design procedure included in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (BDS) for deck overhangs supporting parapets has not been modified for nearly 50 years. The specifications currently recommend that the deck overhang moment demand is taken as the cantilever bending strength of the parapet at its base. This recommendation results in uneconomical deck designs if the parapet is overdesigned. In this research effort, which was performed under National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 12-119, the distribution of vehicle impact loads through the parapet and overhang was characterized, new equations were proposed to calculate overhang design demands, and the effect of deck understrength on parapet capacity was quantified. To develop updated design guidance, physical testing of instrumented specimens was performed, and validated LS-DYNA models were used to evaluate a variety of in-service railing and overhang designs. Results indicated that deck moments from lateral vehicle impact loads can be reliably estimated by assuming they distribute at 45 degrees with downward travel through the parapet and at 60 degrees with inward travel through the overhang. These angles are used to calculate effective lengths at critical sections, and overhang design moments are calculated by dividing the total applied moment over these lengths. Distribution of tensile loads was found to be minimal. The overhang design guidance developed in this project, which is currently under review for adoption into the BDS, routinely results in more economical deck designs than the existing method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241312216
Primary Topic
Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vehicle Collision Load Design Demands for Deck Overhangs with Parapet Railings

Andrew E. Loken, Scott K. Rosenbaugh, Robert W. Bielenberg, Ronald K. Faller et al.
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis
article

Vehicle Collision Load Design Demands for Deck Overhangs with Parapet Railings

Andrew E. Loken, Scott K. Rosenbaugh, Robert W. Bielenberg, Ronald K. Faller, Joshua S. Steelman
article en

Abstract

The majority of bridge rails used in the U.S.A. and Canada are solid concrete parapets. However, the design procedure included in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (BDS) for deck overhangs supporting parapets has not been modified for nearly 50 years. The specifications currently recommend that the deck overhang moment demand is taken as the cantilever bending strength of the parapet at its base. This recommendation results in uneconomical deck designs if the parapet is overdesigned. In this research effort, which was performed under National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 12-119, the distribution of vehicle impact loads through the parapet and overhang was characterized, new equations were proposed to calculate overhang design demands, and the effect of deck understrength on parapet capacity was quantified. To develop updated design guidance, physical testing of instrumented specimens was performed, and validated LS-DYNA models were used to evaluate a variety of in-service railing and overhang designs. Results indicated that deck moments from lateral vehicle impact loads can be reliably estimated by assuming they distribute at 45 degrees with downward travel through the parapet and at 60 degrees with inward travel through the overhang. These angles are used to calculate effective lengths at critical sections, and overhang design moments are calculated by dividing the total applied moment over these lengths. Distribution of tensile loads was found to be minimal. The overhang design guidance developed in this project, which is currently under review for adoption into the BDS, routinely results in more economical deck designs than the existing method.

Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardVol. 2679(6)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.