Insights and Opportunities: Evaluating a University Teaching and Learning Grants Program

We describe a detailed program evaluation for a University-wide teaching and learning grants program at a Canadian research-intensive university. This work was designed to determine if the program is driving the types of changes in practice it was designed to support. We administered a survey that included yes/no response and Likert-scale questions to assess supports provided, outcomes, challenges, and impact of the grants program; and a series of open-ended questions inviting participants to share qualitative narratives describing their perceptions of the program and its effects. Thematic analysis of the survey responses revealed that the grants program provides tremendous value in strengthening scholarly communities and fosters wide ranging benefits to learners and teachers through ripple effects that extend well beyond the stated goals of the program. The engagement of students as partners in scholarly work and the development of local cultures and conversations around the scholarship of teaching and learning generated exciting new opportunities. The program supported innovative teaching strategies and deep engagement in teaching and learning, and provided opportunities for presentation, publication, and support from national funding bodies. It is clear that our institutional teaching and learning grants program is key to fostering a scholarly environment on our campus that benefits the entire community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2024.3.15542
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights and Opportunities: Evaluating a University Teaching and Learning Grants Program

Rachel Stewart, Manan Mukherjee, Rahim Pira, Heather A. Jamniczky et al.
1 citations
The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
2.10
article

Insights and Opportunities: Evaluating a University Teaching and Learning Grants Program

Rachel Stewart, Manan Mukherjee, Rahim Pira, Heather A. Jamniczky, Natasha Kenny, Andrew Mardjetko
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We describe a detailed program evaluation for a University-wide teaching and learning grants program at a Canadian research-intensive university. This work was designed to determine if the program is driving the types of changes in practice it was designed to support. We administered a survey that included yes/no response and Likert-scale questions to assess supports provided, outcomes, challenges, and impact of the grants program; and a series of open-ended questions inviting participants to share qualitative narratives describing their perceptions of the program and its effects. Thematic analysis of the survey responses revealed that the grants program provides tremendous value in strengthening scholarly communities and fosters wide ranging benefits to learners and teachers through ripple effects that extend well beyond the stated goals of the program. The engagement of students as partners in scholarly work and the development of local cultures and conversations around the scholarship of teaching and learning generated exciting new opportunities. The program supported innovative teaching strategies and deep engagement in teaching and learning, and provided opportunities for presentation, publication, and support from national funding bodies. It is clear that our institutional teaching and learning grants program is key to fostering a scholarly environment on our campus that benefits the entire community.

The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and LearningVol. 15(3)
University of Calgary (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.