The Unbearable Lightness of Prompting. A Critical Reflection on the Environmental Impact of genAI use in Design Education

Design educators are finding ways to support students in skillfully using GenAI tools in their practices while encouraging the critical scrutiny of the ethical and social issues around these technologies. However, the issue of environmental sustainability remains unaddressed. There is a lack of resources to grasp the environmental costs of genAI in education, but also, and foremost, a lack of shared practices for engaging with the issue. This paper critically reflects on the energy costs of using genAI in design education, using a workshop held in 2023 with 49 students as a springboard for reflection. Through this reflection, we develop a set of five alternative stances: acceptance, shift, moderation, friction, and refusal. Each of these, and the related actions, can support a conscious use of genAI in design education. The work contributes to the field of design and HCI by bringing together ways for educators to reflect on their practices, informing the future development of educational programs around genAI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3848022
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Unbearable Lightness of Prompting. A Critical Reflection on the Environmental Impact of genAI use in Design Education

Dave Murray-Rust, Maria Luce Lupetti, Elena Cavallin
ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

The Unbearable Lightness of Prompting. A Critical Reflection on the Environmental Impact of genAI use in Design Education

Dave Murray-Rust, Maria Luce Lupetti, Elena Cavallin
article en

Abstract

Design educators are finding ways to support students in skillfully using GenAI tools in their practices while encouraging the critical scrutiny of the ethical and social issues around these technologies. However, the issue of environmental sustainability remains unaddressed. There is a lack of resources to grasp the environmental costs of genAI in education, but also, and foremost, a lack of shared practices for engaging with the issue. This paper critically reflects on the energy costs of using genAI in design education, using a workshop held in 2023 with 49 students as a springboard for reflection. Through this reflection, we develop a set of five alternative stances: acceptance, shift, moderation, friction, and refusal. Each of these, and the related actions, can support a conscious use of genAI in design education. The work contributes to the field of design and HCI by bringing together ways for educators to reflect on their practices, informing the future development of educational programs around genAI.

ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies
Politecnico di Torino (IT), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.