A Comparative Study of Artificial and Natural Intelligence from Ibn Sina’s Perspective

The differentiation between natural intelligence and artificial intelligence represents a significant concern among intellectuals. Artificial intelligence developers, leveraging advancements in neuroscience, cognitive sciences, and advanced theories in the philosophy of mind, aim to replicate the structure and functionality of the human brain through a functionalist and behaviourist lens. Broadly speaking, artificial intelligence can be categorized into two renowned types:Classical Artificial Intelligence or the “Computational Theory of Mind”: This perspective emphasizes the computational and algorithmic side of artificial intelligence and advocates for the mechanization and computerization of the mind.Connectionist Artificial Intelligence: This viewpoint focuses on recreating the “neural networks” of the brain. Additionally, the human soul, as the source of human intelligence, possesses cognitive and motivational powers that act as the soldiers of the soul, generating a variety of actions and effects. This research attempts to re-evaluate the fundamental differences between natural intelligence and artificial intelligence from Ibn Sina's perspective using a rational-analytical approach. According to Ibn Sina, natural intelligence and artificial intelligence differ in eight key areas: composite synthesis, intentionality, creativity and inventiveness, specialization focus, self-awareness and self-discovery, the internal evolution of natural intelligence, the impulsive power of desire, ethical conduct, and the ability to recall.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ecohumanism
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.6082
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Artificial and Natural Intelligence from Ibn Sina’s Perspective

Mustafa ‘Azizi Alawijeh, Seyed Zuhair Al-Mesilini
Journal of Ecohumanism
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
article

A Comparative Study of Artificial and Natural Intelligence from Ibn Sina’s Perspective

Mustafa ‘Azizi Alawijeh, Seyed Zuhair Al-Mesilini
article en

Abstract

The differentiation between natural intelligence and artificial intelligence represents a significant concern among intellectuals. Artificial intelligence developers, leveraging advancements in neuroscience, cognitive sciences, and advanced theories in the philosophy of mind, aim to replicate the structure and functionality of the human brain through a functionalist and behaviourist lens. Broadly speaking, artificial intelligence can be categorized into two renowned types:Classical Artificial Intelligence or the “Computational Theory of Mind”: This perspective emphasizes the computational and algorithmic side of artificial intelligence and advocates for the mechanization and computerization of the mind.Connectionist Artificial Intelligence: This viewpoint focuses on recreating the “neural networks” of the brain. Additionally, the human soul, as the source of human intelligence, possesses cognitive and motivational powers that act as the soldiers of the soul, generating a variety of actions and effects. This research attempts to re-evaluate the fundamental differences between natural intelligence and artificial intelligence from Ibn Sina's perspective using a rational-analytical approach. According to Ibn Sina, natural intelligence and artificial intelligence differ in eight key areas: composite synthesis, intentionality, creativity and inventiveness, specialization focus, self-awareness and self-discovery, the internal evolution of natural intelligence, the impulsive power of desire, ethical conduct, and the ability to recall.

Journal of EcohumanismVol. 4(1)
Al-Mustafa International University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.