The Need For Inclusive NLP: Addressing Sociodemographic Bias and Enhancing Sociotechnical Systems through Interdisciplinary Frameworks

Natural Language Processing systems are increasingly integrated into diverse sociotechnical contexts, playing a pivotal role in essential societal functions. These systems are employed across various domains, such as education, healthcare, and policy-making, offering technical solutions to social issues. However, a critical concern is the opaque nature of these models, often presented and utilized as 'black boxes'. Proprietary restrictions or knowledge gaps obscure the underlying interactions, making them challenging to interpret. The widespread presence of these systems necessitates a thorough examination of their inherent biases and societal implications. Despite a growing body of research on bias in NLP, significant challenges remain. Predominantly, studies focus on race and gender biases, adopt a model-centric approach to analysis, and employ technocentric methods for bias mitigation, often neglecting the broader societal ramifications. Addressing these challenges requires a more comprehensive understanding of how NLP systems, as integral components of broader sociotechnical systems, impact society. This gap underscores the need for a deeper understanding of the societal implications of NLP systems. This research aims to address the complexities posed by sociodemographic biases in NLP systems and the resultant harms within these frameworks. The goal is to develop more inclusive methodologies for identifying, quantifying, and mitigating these biases, bridging the interdisciplinary divide between technical and social sciences, and proposing socially aware frameworks that address the impact of biases in these systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v7i2.31905
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Text Readability and Simplification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Need For Inclusive NLP: Addressing Sociodemographic Bias and Enhancing Sociotechnical Systems through Interdisciplinary Frameworks

Pranav Narayanan Venkit
2 citations
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Text Readability and Simplification
4.96
article

The Need For Inclusive NLP: Addressing Sociodemographic Bias and Enhancing Sociotechnical Systems through Interdisciplinary Frameworks

Pranav Narayanan Venkit
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Natural Language Processing systems are increasingly integrated into diverse sociotechnical contexts, playing a pivotal role in essential societal functions. These systems are employed across various domains, such as education, healthcare, and policy-making, offering technical solutions to social issues. However, a critical concern is the opaque nature of these models, often presented and utilized as 'black boxes'. Proprietary restrictions or knowledge gaps obscure the underlying interactions, making them challenging to interpret. The widespread presence of these systems necessitates a thorough examination of their inherent biases and societal implications. Despite a growing body of research on bias in NLP, significant challenges remain. Predominantly, studies focus on race and gender biases, adopt a model-centric approach to analysis, and employ technocentric methods for bias mitigation, often neglecting the broader societal ramifications. Addressing these challenges requires a more comprehensive understanding of how NLP systems, as integral components of broader sociotechnical systems, impact society. This gap underscores the need for a deeper understanding of the societal implications of NLP systems. This research aims to address the complexities posed by sociodemographic biases in NLP systems and the resultant harms within these frameworks. The goal is to develop more inclusive methodologies for identifying, quantifying, and mitigating these biases, bridging the interdisciplinary divide between technical and social sciences, and proposing socially aware frameworks that address the impact of biases in these systems.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 7(2)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Text Readability and Simplification
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.