A survey on computational pathology foundation models: datasets, adaptation strategies, and evaluation tasks

Abstract Computational pathology foundation models (CPathFMs) have emerged as a powerful approach for analyzing histopathological data, leveraging self-supervised learning to extract robust feature representations from unlabeled whole-slide images. These models, categorized into uni-modal and multi-modal frameworks, have demonstrated promise in automating complex pathology tasks such as segmentation, classification, and biomarker discovery. However, the development of CPathFMs presents significant challenges, such as limited data accessibility, high variability across datasets, the necessity for domain-specific adaptation, and the lack of standardized evaluation benchmarks. This survey provides a comprehensive review of CPathFMs in computational pathology, focusing on pre-training datasets, adaptation strategies, and evaluation tasks. We analyze key techniques, such as contrastive learning, masked image modeling and multi-modal integration, and highlight existing gaps in current research. Finally, we explore future directions from four perspectives for advancing CPathFMs. This survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and AI practitioners, guiding the advancement of CPathFMs toward robust and clinically applicable AI-driven pathology solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge and Information Systems
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-026-02806-1
Citations
5
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
preprint
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
38.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A survey on computational pathology foundation models: datasets, adaptation strategies, and evaluation tasks

Xintao Wu, Yevgeniy R. Semenov, Peter Karl Sorger, Guihong Wan et al.
5 citations
Knowledge and Information Systems
AI in cancer detection
38.65
preprint

A survey on computational pathology foundation models: datasets, adaptation strategies, and evaluation tasks

Xintao Wu, Yevgeniy R. Semenov, Peter Karl Sorger, Guihong Wan, Ajit J. Nirmal, Christine G. Lian, Dong Li, Xinyu Wu, Chen Zhao
preprint en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Computational pathology foundation models (CPathFMs) have emerged as a powerful approach for analyzing histopathological data, leveraging self-supervised learning to extract robust feature representations from unlabeled whole-slide images. These models, categorized into uni-modal and multi-modal frameworks, have demonstrated promise in automating complex pathology tasks such as segmentation, classification, and biomarker discovery. However, the development of CPathFMs presents significant challenges, such as limited data accessibility, high variability across datasets, the necessity for domain-specific adaptation, and the lack of standardized evaluation benchmarks. This survey provides a comprehensive review of CPathFMs in computational pathology, focusing on pre-training datasets, adaptation strategies, and evaluation tasks. We analyze key techniques, such as contrastive learning, masked image modeling and multi-modal integration, and highlight existing gaps in current research. Finally, we explore future directions from four perspectives for advancing CPathFMs. This survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and AI practitioners, guiding the advancement of CPathFMs toward robust and clinically applicable AI-driven pathology solutions.

Knowledge and Information SystemsVol. 68(1)
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US), Baylor University (US), William & Mary (US), Chicago Department of Public Health (US), ScienceSouth (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
AI in cancer detection
38.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.