Aerobic VS Anaerobic Exercise on Body Composition and Hormonal Adaptations in Athletes and Non-Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background:This study examined the differential effects of aerobic and anaerobicexercise on body composition and hormonal adaptations in athletes and non-athletes, providing evidence-based recommendations for optimizing fitness andhealth outcomes, such as training duration, frequency, and the combination ofaerobic and anaerobic exercises.Aim: These specific recommendations aim to enhanceboth physical performance and overall health, tailored to the needs of differentpopulations.Methods: A randomized controlled trialinvolving 120 males(60 athletes,60 non-athletes, aged 18–25 years) was conducted. Participants engaged in 12 weeks ofeither aerobic or anaerobic exercise. The aerobic group performed moderate-intensitycontinuoustraining(MICT)for50minutespersession,3timesperweek,whiletheanaerobicgroupperformed30minutesofresistancetrainingfollowedby20minutesofhigh-intensityintervaltraining(HIIT)3timesperweek.Dual-energyX-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured body composition, while blood samplesassessed testosterone, cortisol, and growth hormone levels. Mixed ANOVA analyzedthe effects of exercise type, athletic status, and time.Results: Anaerobic exercise led to significant increases in lean body mass andstrength, while aerobic exercise induced greater fat loss. Athletes exhibited morepronounced increases in testosterone and growth hormone levels, compared tonon-athletes.Conclusions:Tailoredexerciseprograms,consideringfitnesslevelsandgoals,canoptimize body composition and hormonal health. These findings have practicalimplications for designing effective training regimens for diverse populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Coaching and Sports Science
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58524/jcss.v4i1.553
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aerobic VS Anaerobic Exercise on Body Composition and Hormonal Adaptations in Athletes and Non-Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Md. Shahariar Kabir, Sunita Yadav, San P. Pradhan, Vlad Adrian Geantă et al.
1 citations
Journal of Coaching and Sports Science
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
1.16
article

Aerobic VS Anaerobic Exercise on Body Composition and Hormonal Adaptations in Athletes and Non-Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Md. Shahariar Kabir, Sunita Yadav, San P. Pradhan, Vlad Adrian Geantă, Subhashis Biswas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background:This study examined the differential effects of aerobic and anaerobicexercise on body composition and hormonal adaptations in athletes and non-athletes, providing evidence-based recommendations for optimizing fitness andhealth outcomes, such as training duration, frequency, and the combination ofaerobic and anaerobic exercises.Aim: These specific recommendations aim to enhanceboth physical performance and overall health, tailored to the needs of differentpopulations.Methods: A randomized controlled trialinvolving 120 males(60 athletes,60 non-athletes, aged 18–25 years) was conducted. Participants engaged in 12 weeks ofeither aerobic or anaerobic exercise. The aerobic group performed moderate-intensitycontinuoustraining(MICT)for50minutespersession,3timesperweek,whiletheanaerobicgroupperformed30minutesofresistancetrainingfollowedby20minutesofhigh-intensityintervaltraining(HIIT)3timesperweek.Dual-energyX-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured body composition, while blood samplesassessed testosterone, cortisol, and growth hormone levels. Mixed ANOVA analyzedthe effects of exercise type, athletic status, and time.Results: Anaerobic exercise led to significant increases in lean body mass andstrength, while aerobic exercise induced greater fat loss. Athletes exhibited morepronounced increases in testosterone and growth hormone levels, compared tonon-athletes.Conclusions:Tailoredexerciseprograms,consideringfitnesslevelsandgoals,canoptimize body composition and hormonal health. These findings have practicalimplications for designing effective training regimens for diverse populations.

Journal of Coaching and Sports ScienceVol. 4(1)
ICFAI University, Tripura (IN), NIMS University (IN), Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.