Steam reforming for winery wastewater treatment: Hydrogen production and energy self-sufficiency assessment

A thermodynamic assessment using Gibbs free energy minimization to explore the potential of winery wastewater steam reforming (WWWSR) as a technique to treat water while simultaneously producing renewable hydrogen was conducted for the first time. This assessment focused on four types of reactors: a conventional reactor (CR), a sorption-enhanced reactor (SER) with CO 2 capture, a membrane reactor (MR) with H 2 removal, and a sorption-enhanced membrane reactor (SEMR) that combines features of both the SER and MR. The effects on WWWSR of temperature, pressure, water content in the feed, composition of winery wastewater (WWW), sorbent to feed ratio (SFR), and the split fraction of H 2 in the membrane were studied. For the CR, SER, MR, and SEMR, the study showed that low pressures and high water content in the reactor inlet resulted in higher hydrogen production. Considering a representative WWW composition with a water content of 75 wt% in the feed, it was shown that the CR needed to operate at extremely high temperatures (over 600 °C) to maximize H 2 yield while producing less hydrogen than its counterparts. In contrast, the MR and SER achieved higher hydrogen production at optimal temperatures around 500 °C, while the SEMR performed even better, producing more hydrogen at just 400 °C. Moreover, the organic composition of the feed stream did not significantly influence the optimal temperature and pressure conditions for maximizing hydrogen production. However, wastewater with a higher fraction of sugars generated more hydrogen, whereas wastewater with a higher fraction of acetic acid produced less hydrogen via the steam reforming reaction. Notably, a novel energy analysis was conducted, demonstrating that the energy self-sufficiency of this process changed drastically when different reactor types were considered. Only the MR with a high degree of hydrogen separation in the membrane, the SER with optimal quantities of CO 2 -capturing sorbent, and the SEMR can be energetically self-sufficient, as they produce enough hydrogen to offset the energy expenditure associated with steam reforming. • Winery wastewater (WWW) treatment and valorization via renewable H 2 production. • The better operating conditions depend on the type of reactor and WWW composition. • Reactors combining CO 2 sorption and/or H 2 separation attained higher H 2 yields. • Only reactors integrating CO 2 and/or H 2 separation achieved energy self-sufficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomass and Bioenergy
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107613
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Steam reforming for winery wastewater treatment: Hydrogen production and energy self-sufficiency assessment

M.A. Soria, J.E. Matos, Luís Miguel Madeira
1 citations
Biomass and Bioenergy
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
0.39
article

Steam reforming for winery wastewater treatment: Hydrogen production and energy self-sufficiency assessment

M.A. Soria, J.E. Matos, Luís Miguel Madeira
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A thermodynamic assessment using Gibbs free energy minimization to explore the potential of winery wastewater steam reforming (WWWSR) as a technique to treat water while simultaneously producing renewable hydrogen was conducted for the first time. This assessment focused on four types of reactors: a conventional reactor (CR), a sorption-enhanced reactor (SER) with CO 2 capture, a membrane reactor (MR) with H 2 removal, and a sorption-enhanced membrane reactor (SEMR) that combines features of both the SER and MR. The effects on WWWSR of temperature, pressure, water content in the feed, composition of winery wastewater (WWW), sorbent to feed ratio (SFR), and the split fraction of H 2 in the membrane were studied. For the CR, SER, MR, and SEMR, the study showed that low pressures and high water content in the reactor inlet resulted in higher hydrogen production. Considering a representative WWW composition with a water content of 75 wt% in the feed, it was shown that the CR needed to operate at extremely high temperatures (over 600 °C) to maximize H 2 yield while producing less hydrogen than its counterparts. In contrast, the MR and SER achieved higher hydrogen production at optimal temperatures around 500 °C, while the SEMR performed even better, producing more hydrogen at just 400 °C. Moreover, the organic composition of the feed stream did not significantly influence the optimal temperature and pressure conditions for maximizing hydrogen production. However, wastewater with a higher fraction of sugars generated more hydrogen, whereas wastewater with a higher fraction of acetic acid produced less hydrogen via the steam reforming reaction. Notably, a novel energy analysis was conducted, demonstrating that the energy self-sufficiency of this process changed drastically when different reactor types were considered. Only the MR with a high degree of hydrogen separation in the membrane, the SER with optimal quantities of CO 2 -capturing sorbent, and the SEMR can be energetically self-sufficient, as they produce enough hydrogen to offset the energy expenditure associated with steam reforming. • Winery wastewater (WWW) treatment and valorization via renewable H 2 production. • The better operating conditions depend on the type of reactor and WWW composition. • Reactors combining CO 2 sorption and/or H 2 separation attained higher H 2 yields. • Only reactors integrating CO 2 and/or H 2 separation achieved energy self-sufficiency.

Biomass and BioenergyVol. 194
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.