Archaeology and the Interpretation of the Past in Cormac McCarthy’s Novels

ABSTRACT Many scholars have noted that ruins, trash, and other material traces of the human past pervade the novels of Cormac McCarthy. This article argues that such motifs emerge from his interest in the discipline of field archaeology. The article authors trace three characteristics of archaeology—artifacts, field research, and temporal sequence—through McCarthy’s works and suggest that the discipline shapes how he represents the past. Archaeology provides McCarthy with a model for amplifying the marginal subjects that textual histories elide, articulating material and embodied encounters with the past and evoking the processes of interpretation that such encounters necessitate. Beyond simply depicting archaeology, however, McCarthy also offers a metacommentary on the epistemes that shape archaeological interpretation. Through such metacommentary, he foregrounds the contingent nature of archaeological practice and thus of historical knowledge more broadly. Expanding the scholarly understanding of McCarthy’s interdisciplinarity, this article demonstrates that archaeology represents an overlooked feature of his well-documented passion for empirical inquiry. Archaeology informs how McCarthy represents human history and the formation of knowledge.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Cormac McCarthy Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/cormmccaj.22.2.0161
Primary Topic
Modern American Literature Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Archaeology and the Interpretation of the Past in Cormac McCarthy’s Novels

Joseph Frankl, Leila Braun
The Cormac McCarthy Journal
Modern American Literature Studies
article

Archaeology and the Interpretation of the Past in Cormac McCarthy’s Novels

Joseph Frankl, Leila Braun
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many scholars have noted that ruins, trash, and other material traces of the human past pervade the novels of Cormac McCarthy. This article argues that such motifs emerge from his interest in the discipline of field archaeology. The article authors trace three characteristics of archaeology—artifacts, field research, and temporal sequence—through McCarthy’s works and suggest that the discipline shapes how he represents the past. Archaeology provides McCarthy with a model for amplifying the marginal subjects that textual histories elide, articulating material and embodied encounters with the past and evoking the processes of interpretation that such encounters necessitate. Beyond simply depicting archaeology, however, McCarthy also offers a metacommentary on the epistemes that shape archaeological interpretation. Through such metacommentary, he foregrounds the contingent nature of archaeological practice and thus of historical knowledge more broadly. Expanding the scholarly understanding of McCarthy’s interdisciplinarity, this article demonstrates that archaeology represents an overlooked feature of his well-documented passion for empirical inquiry. Archaeology informs how McCarthy represents human history and the formation of knowledge.

The Cormac McCarthy JournalVol. 22(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Modern American Literature Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Archaeology and the Interpretation of the Past in Cormac McCarthy’s Novels — Joseph Frankl, Leila Braun · The Cormac McCarthy Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS