Traffic flow modelling of vehicles on a six lane freeway: Comparative analysis of improved group method of data handling and artificial neural network model

• Mathematical model for South African freeway using real-time data to analyze traffic conditions. • Group method of Data Handling shows better fit to observed data, outperforming Artificial neural network in predicting traffic flow patterns. • Group method of Data Handling reduces model complexity, improves computing performance, and maintains efficiency. In recent decades, traffic flow modelling has become increasingly significant for improving road transportation systems and mitigating congestion on freeways. This research presents a comparative analysis of two machine learning methodologies—Improved Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)—for modelling vehicular traffic flow on a six-lane freeway. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive accuracy and efficacy of both models in replicating complex traffic patterns and to provide insights into their suitability for real-time traffic flow applications. Traffic flow data were obtained from a six-lane freeway during off-peak and on-peak hours using South African road transportation systems as a case study. Traffic flow variables, such as vehicle density, speed, time, and traffic volume, were considered as both inputs and outputs. The models were trained and validated using this dataset, and the GMDH and ANN were assessed according to their regression efficacy R 2 and MSE. The results indicate that both models can effectively capture the nonlinear relationships present in the traffic flow of vehicles on a six-lane freeway. However, GMDH outperformed ANN in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. The optimal regression values for GMDH and ANN were 0.99372 and 0.9167, respectively, demonstrating that GMDH provided a substantially superior fit to the observed data. The exceptional efficacy of the GMDH is attributed to its self-organising architecture and capacity to autonomously identify the most pertinent inputs, thereby reducing model complexity and enhancing generalisation. Artificial Neural Networks, while efficient, require comprehensive tuning and may experience overfitting in high-dimensional datasets. This study suggests that GMDH is a more reliable and effective model for modelling traffic flow on a six-lane freeway, presenting opportunities for real-time traffic prediction and traffic flow management applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104094
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Traffic control and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traffic flow modelling of vehicles on a six lane freeway: Comparative analysis of improved group method of data handling and artificial neural network model

Frimpong J. Alex, Elmira Jamei, Isaac Oyeyemi Olayode, Alessandro Severino
3 citations
Results in Engineering
Traffic control and management
3.64
article

Traffic flow modelling of vehicles on a six lane freeway: Comparative analysis of improved group method of data handling and artificial neural network model

Frimpong J. Alex, Elmira Jamei, Isaac Oyeyemi Olayode, Alessandro Severino
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Mathematical model for South African freeway using real-time data to analyze traffic conditions. • Group method of Data Handling shows better fit to observed data, outperforming Artificial neural network in predicting traffic flow patterns. • Group method of Data Handling reduces model complexity, improves computing performance, and maintains efficiency. In recent decades, traffic flow modelling has become increasingly significant for improving road transportation systems and mitigating congestion on freeways. This research presents a comparative analysis of two machine learning methodologies—Improved Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)—for modelling vehicular traffic flow on a six-lane freeway. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive accuracy and efficacy of both models in replicating complex traffic patterns and to provide insights into their suitability for real-time traffic flow applications. Traffic flow data were obtained from a six-lane freeway during off-peak and on-peak hours using South African road transportation systems as a case study. Traffic flow variables, such as vehicle density, speed, time, and traffic volume, were considered as both inputs and outputs. The models were trained and validated using this dataset, and the GMDH and ANN were assessed according to their regression efficacy R 2 and MSE. The results indicate that both models can effectively capture the nonlinear relationships present in the traffic flow of vehicles on a six-lane freeway. However, GMDH outperformed ANN in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. The optimal regression values for GMDH and ANN were 0.99372 and 0.9167, respectively, demonstrating that GMDH provided a substantially superior fit to the observed data. The exceptional efficacy of the GMDH is attributed to its self-organising architecture and capacity to autonomously identify the most pertinent inputs, thereby reducing model complexity and enhancing generalisation. Artificial Neural Networks, while efficient, require comprehensive tuning and may experience overfitting in high-dimensional datasets. This study suggests that GMDH is a more reliable and effective model for modelling traffic flow on a six-lane freeway, presenting opportunities for real-time traffic prediction and traffic flow management applications.

Results in EngineeringVol. 25
Wuhan University of Technology (CN), Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT), Swinburne University of Technology (AU), Victoria University (AU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Traffic control and management
3.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.