Development and modelling study of an evidence-based manualised intervention: PErsonalised Treatment packages for Adults with Learning disabilities who display aggressive challenging behaviour in community settings (PETAL)

<ns3:p>Background Aggressive challenging behaviour is prevalent in adults with an intellectual disability and is associated with over-medication, physical ill-health and psychiatric hospitalisation. We urgently need interventions that can moderate this behaviour and improve quality of life in this population. We report on the development and modelling of a 7-module tailored manualised psychological intervention to support adults who display aggressive challenging behaviour in community settings (hence referred to as the PETAL therapy). Method The PETAL therapy was designed following an extensive review of existing management provisions and was co-produced with carers with lived experience and self-advocates with an intellectual disability. A logic model was developed to illustrate the theoretical approach behind the development of the PETAL intervention. A single arm multi-site modelling study was conducted in England to test the delivery and acceptability of the PETAL intervention. Seventeen NHS healthcare professionals were trained during a two-day training programme and were regularly supervised to deliver the therapy in up to 14 weeks. Following completion, we conducted qualitative interviews with stakeholders and explored the intervention’s fidelity and acceptability. Results We held seven co-production meetings and developed the PETAL therapy, consisting of the following modules: Getting to know the person, understanding aggressive challenging behaviour, communication, emotions, a calm environment, carer wellbeing and healthy habits. We then recruited ten dyads or triads (person with a learning disability and 1–2 carers) to participate in a modelling study to test delivery aspects and measure fidelity. Nineteen stakeholders were interviewed, and the findings were analysed deductively using Normalisation Process Theory and its four domains: coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring. Conclusion The PETAL therapy was possible to deliver in community services with high fidelity and was acceptable. The PETAL manual and training programme have been reviewed and refined and a cluster randomised controlled trial is underway.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NIHR Open Research
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13778.1
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and modelling study of an evidence-based manualised intervention: PErsonalised Treatment packages for Adults with Learning disabilities who display aggressive challenging behaviour in community settings (PETAL)

Liz Steed, Umesh Chauhan, Afia Ali, Craig Melville et al.
NIHR Open Research
Family and Disability Support Research
article

Development and modelling study of an evidence-based manualised intervention: PErsonalised Treatment packages for Adults with Learning disabilities who display aggressive challenging behaviour in community settings (PETAL)

Liz Steed, Umesh Chauhan, Afia Ali, Craig Melville, Penny Rapaport, Rachel Royston, Gary McDermott, Vivien Cooper, Andrew J. Jahoda, André Strydom, Rachael Hunter, Angela Hassiotis, Laurence Taggart, Louise Marston, Sally‐Ann Cooper
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background Aggressive challenging behaviour is prevalent in adults with an intellectual disability and is associated with over-medication, physical ill-health and psychiatric hospitalisation. We urgently need interventions that can moderate this behaviour and improve quality of life in this population. We report on the development and modelling of a 7-module tailored manualised psychological intervention to support adults who display aggressive challenging behaviour in community settings (hence referred to as the PETAL therapy). Method The PETAL therapy was designed following an extensive review of existing management provisions and was co-produced with carers with lived experience and self-advocates with an intellectual disability. A logic model was developed to illustrate the theoretical approach behind the development of the PETAL intervention. A single arm multi-site modelling study was conducted in England to test the delivery and acceptability of the PETAL intervention. Seventeen NHS healthcare professionals were trained during a two-day training programme and were regularly supervised to deliver the therapy in up to 14 weeks. Following completion, we conducted qualitative interviews with stakeholders and explored the intervention’s fidelity and acceptability. Results We held seven co-production meetings and developed the PETAL therapy, consisting of the following modules: Getting to know the person, understanding aggressive challenging behaviour, communication, emotions, a calm environment, carer wellbeing and healthy habits. We then recruited ten dyads or triads (person with a learning disability and 1–2 carers) to participate in a modelling study to test delivery aspects and measure fidelity. Nineteen stakeholders were interviewed, and the findings were analysed deductively using Normalisation Process Theory and its four domains: coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring. Conclusion The PETAL therapy was possible to deliver in community services with high fidelity and was acceptable. The PETAL manual and training programme have been reviewed and refined and a cluster randomised controlled trial is underway.</ns3:p>

NIHR Open ResearchVol. 5
University of London (GB), University of Ulster (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), King's College London (GB), University of Lancashire (GB), The Challenging Behaviour Foundation (GB), Roland Hill (United Kingdom) (GB), University College London (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Programme Grants for Applied Research, Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Family and Disability Support Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.