Fundamental Rights Within the European Arrest Warrant

The mechanism of the surrender of wanted persons on the territory of the Europen Union experienced a natural evolution over time with the construction of European integration and the development of the area of freedom, security and justice. Starting from the traditional difficult extradition procedures in which the political factor was decisive, it was now established a judicial procedure under the jurisdiction of independent and impartial courts, in which only legal criteria are intended to be applicable, with the total exclusion of political decision-makers. Given that the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) is based on mutual trust between the judicial authorities of the member states, it works in the vast majority of cases. However, the principle of mutual trust between member states is not an absolute one and has encountered some limitations, allowing the refusal to execute the European arrest warrant in certain situations, in which the concrete violation of the right to a fair trial or the suffering of degrading and inhumane treatments would be found.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62768/tbj/2024/14/4/04
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fundamental Rights Within the European Arrest Warrant

Diana Geanina Ionaș, Cristinel Ghigheci, Vlad Neagoe, Roxana Matefi
Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

Fundamental Rights Within the European Arrest Warrant

Diana Geanina Ionaș, Cristinel Ghigheci, Vlad Neagoe, Roxana Matefi
article en

Abstract

The mechanism of the surrender of wanted persons on the territory of the Europen Union experienced a natural evolution over time with the construction of European integration and the development of the area of freedom, security and justice. Starting from the traditional difficult extradition procedures in which the political factor was decisive, it was now established a judicial procedure under the jurisdiction of independent and impartial courts, in which only legal criteria are intended to be applicable, with the total exclusion of political decision-makers. Given that the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) is based on mutual trust between the judicial authorities of the member states, it works in the vast majority of cases. However, the principle of mutual trust between member states is not an absolute one and has encountered some limitations, allowing the refusal to execute the European arrest warrant in certain situations, in which the concrete violation of the right to a fair trial or the suffering of degrading and inhumane treatments would be found.

Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International LawVol. 14(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fundamental Rights Within the European Arrest Warrant — Diana Geanina Ionaș, Cristinel Ghigheci, et al. · Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS