Willingness to pay for landscape benefits: Examining variation by landscape type in Lower Silesia, Poland

• We offer insights into public willingness to pay for landscape benefits. • People are willing to pay 22-28 euro a year for 2%-4% increase in coverage of new public forest in their municipality. • The paper combines participatory mapping and choice experiments to value preferences and improve economic understanding. • Outdoor activities often occur near homes, highlighting forest landscapes' key role for residents. • Rural residents value landscape services that provide nearby activity spaces and reduce travel to basic services. Like ecosystems, landscapes provide benefits that significantly influence human well-being. However, these benefits are often taken for granted and not accounted for in monetary terms. This project explores how local communities use the surrounding landscapes and the frequency and value of using different types of landscapes for various activities. In a participatory mapping questionnaire, inhabitants of 6 research areas in the Lower Silesia region indicated places where they carry out different activities in selected types of landscapes. Using a discrete choice experiment, we then investigated the public’s willingness to pay for increased provision of landscape services related to the landscape’s spiritual, educational, cultural, aesthetic, and recreational value. Respondents perform the highest number of activities in landscape units where they live. The value of forest landscape is highest, and it is also perceived as multifunctional. There is a significant difference between urban, suburban, and rural respondents, especially in valuing travel time to basic facilities and the importance of place of social integration. Results guide directions for future changes in local landscapes as well as considerations for identifying and valuing landscape benefits in different landscape types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113129
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Willingness to pay for landscape benefits: Examining variation by landscape type in Lower Silesia, Poland

Monika Lebiedzińska, Iga Kołodyńska, Marek Furmankiewicz, Piotr Krajewski et al.
3 citations
Ecological Indicators
Economic and Environmental Valuation
9.39
article

Willingness to pay for landscape benefits: Examining variation by landscape type in Lower Silesia, Poland

Monika Lebiedzińska, Iga Kołodyńska, Marek Furmankiewicz, Piotr Krajewski, Mikołaj Czajkowski, Marta Sylla, Katarzyna Zagórska
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• We offer insights into public willingness to pay for landscape benefits. • People are willing to pay 22-28 euro a year for 2%-4% increase in coverage of new public forest in their municipality. • The paper combines participatory mapping and choice experiments to value preferences and improve economic understanding. • Outdoor activities often occur near homes, highlighting forest landscapes' key role for residents. • Rural residents value landscape services that provide nearby activity spaces and reduce travel to basic services. Like ecosystems, landscapes provide benefits that significantly influence human well-being. However, these benefits are often taken for granted and not accounted for in monetary terms. This project explores how local communities use the surrounding landscapes and the frequency and value of using different types of landscapes for various activities. In a participatory mapping questionnaire, inhabitants of 6 research areas in the Lower Silesia region indicated places where they carry out different activities in selected types of landscapes. Using a discrete choice experiment, we then investigated the public’s willingness to pay for increased provision of landscape services related to the landscape’s spiritual, educational, cultural, aesthetic, and recreational value. Respondents perform the highest number of activities in landscape units where they live. The value of forest landscape is highest, and it is also perceived as multifunctional. There is a significant difference between urban, suburban, and rural respondents, especially in valuing travel time to basic facilities and the importance of place of social integration. Results guide directions for future changes in local landscapes as well as considerations for identifying and valuing landscape benefits in different landscape types.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 171
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences (PL), University of Warsaw (PL)
Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu, Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.