Self-reported preferences for seasonal daylight saving time meet fundamentals of human physiology: Correlations in the 2018 public consultation by the European Commission

We analyze the results to question 2 (individual preferences for cancelling or keeping the current clock regulations) from the 2018 Public Consultation on summertime arrangements (DST) conducted by the European Commission. We reveal correlations in the shares of population for cancelling the regulations and the winter sunrise time (SRW) [<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.177; <i>p</i> = 0.03; <i>N</i> = 25] and the onset of human activity [<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.677; <i>p</i> = 5 × 10<sup>-5</sup>; <i>N</i> = 17]. The results are in line with the rationale behind the regulations in the range of latitude 35 to 63: larger values of SRW (larger latitude) brought larger shares against the regulations; and earlier onset of human activity relative to SRW brought larger shares against the regulations. The shares for cancelling the regulation did not show correlations with time offset (position in time zone), thus challenging the current view within the circadian community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chronobiology International
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2025.2456562
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-reported preferences for seasonal daylight saving time meet fundamentals of human physiology: Correlations in the 2018 public consultation by the European Commission

José María Martín‐Olalla, J. Mira
1 citations
Chronobiology International
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
0.91
article

Self-reported preferences for seasonal daylight saving time meet fundamentals of human physiology: Correlations in the 2018 public consultation by the European Commission

José María Martín‐Olalla, J. Mira
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We analyze the results to question 2 (individual preferences for cancelling or keeping the current clock regulations) from the 2018 Public Consultation on summertime arrangements (DST) conducted by the European Commission. We reveal correlations in the shares of population for cancelling the regulations and the winter sunrise time (SRW) [<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.177; <i>p</i> = 0.03; <i>N</i> = 25] and the onset of human activity [<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.677; <i>p</i> = 5 × 10<sup>-5</sup>; <i>N</i> = 17]. The results are in line with the rationale behind the regulations in the range of latitude 35 to 63: larger values of SRW (larger latitude) brought larger shares against the regulations; and earlier onset of human activity relative to SRW brought larger shares against the regulations. The shares for cancelling the regulation did not show correlations with time offset (position in time zone), thus challenging the current view within the circadian community.

Chronobiology InternationalVol. 42(2)
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
0.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.