Efficacy and safety of albumin-bound docetaxel vs. docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A multicenter, randomized, phase II study.

333 Background: Docetaxel has demonstrated promising activity in gastric cancer, both as monotherapy and in combination with other agents. Albumin-bound docetaxel (HB1801) is a new kind of taxane and has many advantages compared with docetaxel. Previous phase I study has demonstrated that HB1801 showed preliminary efficacy in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: In this phase II study, eligible patients were aged 18-75 years with histologically confirmed gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma, who progressed on at least first line of combined chemotherapy of platinum and fluorouracil. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive HB1801 (100 mg/m 2 ) or docetaxel (Taxotere, 75 mg/m 2 ) administered every 3 weeks by intravenous infusion. Stratified factors included previous treatment with immunotherapy (yes or no) and ECOG PS (0 or 1). Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Results: As of June 25, 2024, 128 patients were randomized to the HB1801 group ( n =65) or the docetaxel group ( n =63). The two groups were comparable on baseline characteristics. Overall, the median age was 59.0 (range 27-75) years, 106 (82.8%) patients had ECOG PS of 1. 76 (59.4%) patients had received previous treatment with immunotherapy. 76 (59.4%) patients had ≥ 2 metastatic sites. Median PFS was 4.0 months (95%CI 2.8-4.2) with HB1801 versus 2.7 months (95%CI 1.8-3.0) with docetaxel, HR = 0.81(95%CI 0.53, 1.21). Objective response rate and disease control rate were 21.5% (1CR and 13 PRs, 95%CI 12.3-33.5) and 56.9% (20 SDs, 95%CI 44.0-69.2) in the HB1801 group, compared with 14.3% (1 CR and 8 PRs, 95%CI 6.8-25.4) and 42.9% (17 SDs, 95%CI 30.5-56.0) in the docetaxel group. Median overall survival was 11.3 months with HB1801 versus 7.8 months with docetaxel (HR = 0.59 [95%CI 0.35, 1.01], p=0.025). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 93.8% of patients receiving HB1801, and 93.7% of patients receiving docetaxel. Alopecia (46.2% vs. 39.7%), fatigue (43.1% vs 23.8%), anemia (40.0% vs 39.7%), hypoalbuminemia (29.2% vs 12.7%), decreased appetite (21.5% vs 12.7%), peripheral edema (16.9% vs 12.7%) and nausea (15.4% vs 19.0%) were the most common TRAEs in the HB1801 group and the docetaxel group. 20 patients (30.8%) in the HB1801 group and 19 patients (30.2%) in the docetaxel group experienced ≥grade 3 TRAEs, with the most common being anemia and fatigue. 3 patients in the docetaxel group experienced treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to death, which one was considered to be treatment-related. No patients in the HB1801 group had TEAEs leading to death. No new safety signal was observed in HB1801 group. Conclusions: Compared with Taxotere, HB1801 results in 41% reduction in risk of death with a manageable safety profile in patients with previously treated advanced G/GEJ cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT05705635 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.333
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of albumin-bound docetaxel vs. docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A multicenter, randomized, phase II study.

Xiujuan Qu, Rongbo Lin, Xin Zhao, Yanyan Zeng et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Efficacy and safety of albumin-bound docetaxel vs. docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A multicenter, randomized, phase II study.

Xiujuan Qu, Rongbo Lin, Xin Zhao, Yanyan Zeng, Youguo Dai, Ying Cheng, Yang Yan, Hongli Li, Wei Wang, Zhiqiang Wang, Zhiwei Li, Jun Zhao, Hao Liu, Dongliang Chen, Zhe Zhang, Mudan Yang, Rui‐Hua Xu, Hui Li, Xiwen Huang, Jufeng Wang
article en

Abstract

333 Background: Docetaxel has demonstrated promising activity in gastric cancer, both as monotherapy and in combination with other agents. Albumin-bound docetaxel (HB1801) is a new kind of taxane and has many advantages compared with docetaxel. Previous phase I study has demonstrated that HB1801 showed preliminary efficacy in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: In this phase II study, eligible patients were aged 18-75 years with histologically confirmed gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma, who progressed on at least first line of combined chemotherapy of platinum and fluorouracil. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive HB1801 (100 mg/m 2 ) or docetaxel (Taxotere, 75 mg/m 2 ) administered every 3 weeks by intravenous infusion. Stratified factors included previous treatment with immunotherapy (yes or no) and ECOG PS (0 or 1). Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Results: As of June 25, 2024, 128 patients were randomized to the HB1801 group ( n =65) or the docetaxel group ( n =63). The two groups were comparable on baseline characteristics. Overall, the median age was 59.0 (range 27-75) years, 106 (82.8%) patients had ECOG PS of 1. 76 (59.4%) patients had received previous treatment with immunotherapy. 76 (59.4%) patients had ≥ 2 metastatic sites. Median PFS was 4.0 months (95%CI 2.8-4.2) with HB1801 versus 2.7 months (95%CI 1.8-3.0) with docetaxel, HR = 0.81(95%CI 0.53, 1.21). Objective response rate and disease control rate were 21.5% (1CR and 13 PRs, 95%CI 12.3-33.5) and 56.9% (20 SDs, 95%CI 44.0-69.2) in the HB1801 group, compared with 14.3% (1 CR and 8 PRs, 95%CI 6.8-25.4) and 42.9% (17 SDs, 95%CI 30.5-56.0) in the docetaxel group. Median overall survival was 11.3 months with HB1801 versus 7.8 months with docetaxel (HR = 0.59 [95%CI 0.35, 1.01], p=0.025). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 93.8% of patients receiving HB1801, and 93.7% of patients receiving docetaxel. Alopecia (46.2% vs. 39.7%), fatigue (43.1% vs 23.8%), anemia (40.0% vs 39.7%), hypoalbuminemia (29.2% vs 12.7%), decreased appetite (21.5% vs 12.7%), peripheral edema (16.9% vs 12.7%) and nausea (15.4% vs 19.0%) were the most common TRAEs in the HB1801 group and the docetaxel group. 20 patients (30.8%) in the HB1801 group and 19 patients (30.2%) in the docetaxel group experienced ≥grade 3 TRAEs, with the most common being anemia and fatigue. 3 patients in the docetaxel group experienced treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to death, which one was considered to be treatment-related. No patients in the HB1801 group had TEAEs leading to death. No new safety signal was observed in HB1801 group. Conclusions: Compared with Taxotere, HB1801 results in 41% reduction in risk of death with a manageable safety profile in patients with previously treated advanced G/GEJ cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT05705635 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Harbin Medical University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Changzhi Medical College (CN), Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN), Meizhou City People's Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University (CN), Jilin Province Tumor Hospital (CN), Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN), Gansu Provincial Hospital (CN), Hunan Cancer Hospital (CN), Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital (CN), First Hospital of China Medical University (CN), Henan Cancer Hospital (CN), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN), Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital (CN), State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, China Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.