Patterns of radiological progression in participants (pts) with embolization-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with durvalumab (D) + bevacizumab (B) + transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and placebos + TACE: EMERALD-1 post hoc analys
574 Background: EMERALD-1 (NCT03778957) met its primary endpoint, demonstrating improved progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with locoregional HCC treated with D + B + TACE versus placebos (PBO) + TACE (stratified Cox proportional hazards hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61–0.98 [Lencioni R, et al. J Clin Oncol 2024;42(suppl 3). Abs LBA432]). This post hoc analysis assessed outcomes by radiological progression pattern in pts treated with D + B + TACE or PBO + TACE. Methods: Pts included in this analysis received D (1500 mg) or PBO for D (Q4W) in combination with conventional (c)- or drug-eluting bead (DEB)-TACE (investigator choice, 1–4 TACE procedures within 16 weeks). Subsequently, pts received D (1120 mg) + B (15 mg/kg), or PBO for D + B (Q3W). This study analyzed radiological progression patterns at the time of first progressive disease (PD) as assessed by the investigator per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. A new lesion was classified as a new intrahepatic lesion (NIH) or new extrahepatic lesion (NEH); tumor growth of existing intrahepatic lesions (increase of ≥20% of an existing target lesion with at least >5 mm absolute increase or unequivocal PD with a non-target lesion) was classified as intrahepatic growth (IHG; categories were not mutually exclusive). Efficacy was assessed by time to progression (TTP). Results: In the D + B + TACE arm, 53.9% of pts had PD, and in the PBO + TACE arm 79.0% of pts had PD. The most common pattern of disease progression across both treatment arms was NIH, occurring in 73 (35.8%) and 107 (52.2%) pts in the D + B + TACE and PBO + TACE arms, respectively, with 31 (15.2%) and 34 (16.6%) pts exhibiting IHG, and 24 (11.8%) and 39 (19.0%) pts exhibiting NEH, respectively. Improved TTP was observed in pts treated with D + B + TACE versus PBO + TACE, regardless of progression pattern (Table). Conclusions: Overall, the rate of progression was lower with D + B + TACE compared with PBO + TACE. The pattern of disease progression observed with D + B + TACE and PBO + TACE was similar, with NIH the most common pattern of progression in both treatment arms. Consistent benefit in TTP was observed with D + B + TACE versus PBO + TACE, regardless of progression pattern. Clinical trial information: NCT03778957 . NIH IHG NEH D + B + TACE (n=73) PBO + TACE (n=107) D + B + TACE (n=31) PBO + TACE (n=34) D + B + TACE (n=24) PBO + TACE (n=39) Median (95% CI) TTP, months 13.7 (10.8–16.5) 8.8 (7.0–10.9) 5.1 (3.0–9.0) 4.3 (2.9–4.8) 6.7 (2.8–16.6) 4.6 (2.9–6.8) HR (95% CI)* 0.78 (0.57–1.07) 0.61 (0.36–1.03) 0.66 (0.36–1.15) *HR and CI were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model, the CI was calculated using a profile likelihood approach.
Authors
- Melissa Eastgate (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7560-5026)
- Vikas Ostwal
- Gustavo Vasconcelos Alves (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4985-5555)
- Gina M. Vaccaro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3934-0806)
- Rebecca Griffin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4521-948X)
- Joseph P. Erinjeri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1876-727X)
- Sajid Ali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0696-3057)
- Stephen L. Chan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8998-5480)
- Kavitha Balaji (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5759-3589)
- Hidekatsu Kuroda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-1087)
- Alexey Manikhas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9616-6635)
- Mohamed Bouattour (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3919-4135)
- Tuoi T. N. Vo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4160-0566)
- Bruno Sangro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4177-6417)
- Shanzhi Gu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6603-7792)
- C. Díaz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7681-9037)
- Joong-Won Park
- Thatthan Suksombooncharoen
Institutions
- AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Iwate Medical University (JP)
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU)
- Hôpital Beaujon (FR)
- Tata Memorial Hospital (IN)
- Cho Ray Hospital (VN)
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
- Prince of Wales Hospital (CN)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES)
- Hunan Cancer Hospital (CN)
- Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição (BR)
- National Cancer Center (KR)
- City Clinical Oncology Center (RU)
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES)
- Tennessee Oncology (US)
- Myongji Hospital (KR)
- AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (MX)
- Chiang Mai University (TH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2025-01-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.574
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.64