Who is American? A comprehensive analysis of the American = White/Foreign = Asian stereotype (2007–2023)

Against the backdrop of increasing ethnic diversity in the U.S., we replicate, extend, and challenge previous examinations of the American = White/Foreign = Asian stereotype in the largest sample to date (N = 666,623 respondents) over 17 years (2007-2023). Six key findings emerged. First, a robust American = White association emerged on implicit (Cohen's d = 0.50) and explicit (Cohen's d = 0.51) measures. Second, the strength of this effect varied by respondents' race/ethnicity with implicit stereotypes strongest among White respondents (Cohen's d = 0.86) and absent among East Asian respondents (Cohen's d = 0.02). Third, the strength of implicit stereotypes was modulated by age, religion, and ideology-older, Christian, and conservative respondents displayed stronger implicit American = White associations-but not gender or education. Fourth, respondents living in U.S. metropolitan areas with greater Asian representation or a history of voting for Democratic candidates exhibited weaker implicit American = White associations. Fifth, over the past 17 years, implicit and explicit American = White associations decreased by 41% and 47%, respectively, and 14/14 demographic subgroups changed towards neutrality. Finally, we observed suggestive evidence that implicit stereotype trends towards neutrality were temporarily disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic for White Americans but not Asian Americans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83794-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who is American? A comprehensive analysis of the American = White/Foreign = Asian stereotype (2007–2023)

Tessa Elizabeth Sadie Charlesworth, Mahzarin R. Banaji, Thierry Devos, Kirsten N. Morehouse
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
article

Who is American? A comprehensive analysis of the American = White/Foreign = Asian stereotype (2007–2023)

Tessa Elizabeth Sadie Charlesworth, Mahzarin R. Banaji, Thierry Devos, Kirsten N. Morehouse
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Against the backdrop of increasing ethnic diversity in the U.S., we replicate, extend, and challenge previous examinations of the American = White/Foreign = Asian stereotype in the largest sample to date (N = 666,623 respondents) over 17 years (2007-2023). Six key findings emerged. First, a robust American = White association emerged on implicit (Cohen's d = 0.50) and explicit (Cohen's d = 0.51) measures. Second, the strength of this effect varied by respondents' race/ethnicity with implicit stereotypes strongest among White respondents (Cohen's d = 0.86) and absent among East Asian respondents (Cohen's d = 0.02). Third, the strength of implicit stereotypes was modulated by age, religion, and ideology-older, Christian, and conservative respondents displayed stronger implicit American = White associations-but not gender or education. Fourth, respondents living in U.S. metropolitan areas with greater Asian representation or a history of voting for Democratic candidates exhibited weaker implicit American = White associations. Fifth, over the past 17 years, implicit and explicit American = White associations decreased by 41% and 47%, respectively, and 14/14 demographic subgroups changed towards neutrality. Finally, we observed suggestive evidence that implicit stereotype trends towards neutrality were temporarily disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic for White Americans but not Asian Americans.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Northwestern University (US), Harvard University (US), San Diego State University (US), Harvard University Press (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.